The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×
ARTICLENo Access

PSYCHIATRIC ASPECT OF EDUCATION—GRADE PERIOD

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.92.4.837

In summary I want to reemphasize that the grade period, both in school and in home and community, is not only a period of further self discovery for the child, but also a period of self-realization and a chance for the utilization of his own strengths as he begins to determine the nature of his interests and the quality of his responses. School is an instrument devised by our culture to give direction to part of the growth and to provide tools to aid the process of self-realization.

If too much rigidity and direction is provided, both in the content and in the quality of direction, the child may be blocked in the positive unfolding of his own interests and develop those negative attitudes which too commonly interfere with the achievement of the educational goal—self-direction in utilizing and developing own capacities. And if too little direction is provided, the child who has not achieved any very clear realization of what he is may be left too much to his own direction which can lead to confusion and inaction.

The psychiatrist with his interest in the growth steps of the child and his awareness of how this growth is influenced can make an important contribution to the advancement of educational procedure as it proceeds to perfect its program to provide a healthy medium to direct the learning of the child. I would like to see this contribution come through attention to some of these broader issues rather than in the interfering and more authoritative ways which Mr. Thayer correctly criticizes in his abstract.

Collaboration on a different basis, with mutual recognition of the contributions and limitations of the other, can lead to more application of sound principles of growth to this period of the child's educational life.

Access content

To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.