The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.115.6.522

The doctor-patient relationship which characterizes a given situation depends on two principal categories of variables: the medical situation and the social scene. The cultural matrix impinges on the individual characteristics of both physician and patient in the form of learned orientations to disease, treatment, cure and to the doctor-patient relationship itself.

We have briefly reviewed and commented on the probable connections between the socio-historical and intellectual-scientific circumstances of 6 historical epochs and the prevalent type (s) of doctor-patient relationship.

It is our thesis that the value of a specific pattern of the doctor-patient relationship can be established only by evaluating all the relevant and pertinent variables. We would suggest, however, that awareness of the cultural relativity of the doctor-patient relationship should make us skeptical of the assumption that our current practices are "good" or the "best possible." Probably more often than not, they are neither, but simply reflect the congruence of social expectations and socially shared ethical orientations of physicians. In this connection, physicians, and perhaps psychiatrists particularly, explicitly may consider which of the following 3 alternatives they favor: 1. That they reflect the prevalent social values and expectations of their culture; 2. That they lag behind the social changes of the time and represent the values of the immediate past; or 3. That they join with those forces in society which lead to its modification (whether to "progress" or "regress"). Critical examination of the doctor-patient relationship usually predisposes to change, while non-scrutiny of human social relations favors the status quo.

Access content

To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.