The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.110.12.883

1. A main purpose has been to build a "control" series of 567 consecutive manic-depressive cases under hospital treatment before the advent of shock methods (1925-34). Recovery rates are found to be 59% on discharge, 55% after one year, and 64½% after 5 years.

2. A comparison with 563 consecutive cases under the same hospital treatment with EST available (1940-46) and used in about ¾ of these cases suffers because less than one-half could be followed for 5 (war) years. However, the recovery rates are 72% on discharge, 71% after one year, and 66% after 5 years.

3. In the control group the average stay in the Pennsylvania Hospital for recovered cases was 4.5 months; in the later group recovered patients (¾ of them treated with EST) had an average stay of 2.3 months.

4. Over half of all cases who recovered in both series remained well for 5 years or more. The EST series showed more breakdowns in those who could be followed.

5. The usefulness of electric shock therapy in shortening attacks is clear.

6. The importance of emphasizing "shortening the attack" is shown by a look at those patients listed as in fair condition with a minor defect—or much improved. There are more of these in the control series and there 135 cases would add nearly 24% to the proportion of good results on discharge. In 1940-46 there were 97 cases or only 17% to be added. But again in this group which might be called "much improved" the controls averaged 4.8 months' hospital stay while the advent of EST reduced the time to 2.3 months.

Access content

To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.