The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×
Letters to the EditorFull Access

Recommendations for the Usage of Ketamine and Esketamine

TO THE EDITOR: The article by McIntyre et al. (1) aims to synthesize the literature on ketamine and esketamine with respect to efficacy, safety, and tolerability, and to provide guidance for implementation but provides no description of the methodology for the work involved. Given that the extensive disclosure statements reveal that a number of the authors have significant financial interests in the usage of these compounds, several questions arise: How was this “international group of mood disorder experts” selected? How was the work funded? Who wrote the paper and was a professional writing consultant involved? Is there any communication between the editorial and advertising staff regarding planned publication of a given article and simultaneous advertisements by firms marketing the agents under review?

Greater transparency regarding these recurrent issues would be a desirable goal.

Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California San Francisco
Send correspondence to Dr. Reus ().
Reference

1 McIntyre RS, Rosenblat JD, Nemeroff CB, et al.: Synthesizing the evidence for ketamine and esketamine in treatment-resistant depression: an international expert opinion on the available evidence and implementation. Am J Psychiatry 2021; 178:383–399LinkGoogle Scholar