The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×
No Access

Psychiatric malpractice: the California experience

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.136.5.650

The cost of psychiatric malpractice insurance has increased dramatically in recent years. To shed light on the extent to which this increase is justified the author polled 133 California psychiatrists who had indicated experience with some form of claims activity over the past 5 years. The 107 respondents reported 105 cases, of which 57 (54%) resulted in no more than a notification of a possible claim, 22 (21%) did not proceed beyond legal deposition, 20 (19%) were settled by dollar payment before trial, and 6 (6%) were left to the courts. The author recommends tort reform and refinement of reported claim and loss data to contain the cost of malpractice insurance.

Access content

To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.