Primary prevention in perspective
Abstract
Discussion of primary prevention has been made difficult by lack of clarity of underlying concepts and assumptions. Is the purpose to prevent diagnosable mental illness or to prevent unhappiness and social incompetence? What are the implications of the assumption that societal stress causes mental illness? Is there a clear distinction made between major and minor mental illness? Except for a few specific conditions there is little evidence that primary prevention has been effective. The authors feel that research and program evaluation in prevention is sorely needed but should be funded separately and with discretion. Scarce mental health funds should not be diverted from direct treatment for this purpose.
Access content
To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.- Personal login
- Institutional Login
- Sign in via OpenAthens
- Register for access
-
Please login/register if you wish to pair your device and check access availability.
Not a subscriber?
PsychiatryOnline subscription options offer access to the DSM-5 library, books, journals, CME, and patient resources. This all-in-one virtual library provides psychiatrists and mental health professionals with key resources for diagnosis, treatment, research, and professional development.
Need more help? PsychiatryOnline Customer Service may be reached by emailing [email protected] or by calling 800-368-5777 (in the U.S.) or 703-907-7322 (outside the U.S.).
