Functioning at the clinical-research interface: the clinical-research meeting
Abstract
The authors describe their experience in carrying out clinical and psychobiological research in a therapeutic milieu setting. The clinical- research meeting, composed of clinical-care staff with secondary research responsibilities, researchers, and acutely psychotic patients, proved to be a useful mechanism for identifying and resolving inevitable problems at the clinical-research interface and enhanced the effectiveness of research implementation and patient care. The authors discuss three specific areas where covert issues threatened to undermine the work of the unit-the abrogation of research responsibility, the abrogation of clinical responsibility, and intergroup competition and envy.
Access content
To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.- Personal login
- Institutional Login
- Sign in via OpenAthens
- Register for access
-
Please login/register if you wish to pair your device and check access availability.
Not a subscriber?
PsychiatryOnline subscription options offer access to the DSM-5 library, books, journals, CME, and patient resources. This all-in-one virtual library provides psychiatrists and mental health professionals with key resources for diagnosis, treatment, research, and professional development.
Need more help? PsychiatryOnline Customer Service may be reached by emailing [email protected] or by calling 800-368-5777 (in the U.S.) or 703-907-7322 (outside the U.S.).