The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×
Site maintenance Monday, July 8th, 2024. Please note that access to some content and account information will be unavailable on this date.
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.116.4.344

The following factors have likely been paramount in the operational success of the Philadelphia regional mental health program:

1. Excellent timing of the program coinciding with the peak development of interest and goodwill on the part of an informed public and dedicated governments;

2. Intensified and continuous communication among popular representatives, professional staffs and political bodies;

3. Creation of two important cooperating governmental mental health units–the Philadelphia division of mental health within the Department of Public Health and the State of Pennsylvania's office of the Commissioner of Mental Health within the Department of Welfare (now Public Welfare);

4. Establishment and continuation of the Conjoint Mental Health Board;

5. Creation and intensification of the programs of the reception center;

6. Maintenance of continuous and perpetual statistical control over all aspects of the program;

7. Constant application and initiation of various researches and surveys including program self-reevaluation;

8. Attention to all of the community's mental health needs in a comprehensive program;

9. Utilization of operational elements proved effective in other localities (profiting vicariously from others' mistakes);

10. Involvement of the lay and professional communities wherever possible;

11. Encouragement of leadership at the lowest possible echelon of responsibility in the overall administrative pattern.

12. Giving credit where due in public and press relations.

Access content

To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.