The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×
ArticleNo Access

CLINICAL EVALUATION OF AZACYCLONOL, CHLORPROMAZINE, AND RESERPINE ON A GROUP OF CHRONIC PSYCHOTIC PATIENTS

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.112.9.678

1. Clinical evaluations of azacyclonol, reserpine, and chlorpromazine were made in turn on the same group of chronic, moderately disturbed, psychotic patients, most of whom revealed schizophrenic reactions maintained through long hospitalization.

2. Beneficial results were obtained with each of the 3 drugs, but not necessarily in the same patients; nor were all patients helped by any one drug.

3. Consideration of the total number of patient improvements in our limited series showed reserpine to be best, closely followed by chlorpromazine, and then by azacyclonol.

4. From the analysis of the results in relation to the different diagnostic categories, it would seem that the hebephrenic and hebephreno-catatoonic patients were helped most by reserpine, next came azacyclonol, while chlorpromazine was least effective. In the treatment of paranoid patients chlorpromazine was most beneficial, followed by reserpine, and then by azacyclonol. The schizo-affective patients exhibited best improvement with chlorpromazine. One case of involutional depression was strikingly benefited by reserpine.

5. Limiting the validity of these conclusions to the types of patients studied we find that it is possible to differentiate between the use of each of these drugs in different psychiatric categories and to indicate the choice of drug that may prove most useful in the treatment of a given case.

Access content

To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.