The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×
Communications and UpdatesFull Access

Genetic Variation in KCNH2 and a Unique hERG Isoform in Patients With Schizophrenia: Efficacy-Safety Link

To the Editor: Based on the results of an NIMH double-blind trial and the Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness (CATIE) study, Apud et al. (1) have provided support for the hypothesis of Huffaker et al. (2) that a genetic variation in the hERG1 protein, the KCNH2 3.1 isoform, may be related to treatment response. Could this hypothesis be extended to personalized medicine to minimize the risk of dysrhythmias related to QTc prolongation by giving antipsychotics only to those who will benefit from them? Or better, could we de-risk compounds by developing more targeted drugs that only bind to brain KCNH2 3.1?

The patient samples in the NIMH (N=54) and the CATIE study (N=364) are too small to predict with any statistical certainty whether or not individuals with the KCNH2 3.1 isoform were more likely to experience QT/QTc prolongation and related events, since torsade de pointes is extremely rare (3). In phase 1 of the CATIE study (4), 0/231 QTc prolongation events were reported in the olanzapine group, 6/214 (3%) in the quetiapine group, 7/218 (3%) in the risperidone group, 2/172 (1%) in the perphenazine group, and 2/148 (1%) in the ziprasidone group; these values were not statistically different, and there were no instances of torsade de pointes. Citrome and Stroup (5) calculated the number needed to harm based on these data and found it was between 31.1 and 86. Were these patients with QTc prolongation treatment responders? Did they carry the isoform KCNH2 3.1?

Extending this inquiry, might it be valuable to perform genotyping on patients in antipsychotic drug clinical trials who experience QTc prolongation or its sequelae?

Mendham, N.J.

Dr. Warner works for Novartis Pharmaceuticals.

References

1 Apud JA, Zhang F, Decot H, Bigos KL, Weinberger DR: Genetic variation in KCNH2 associated with expression in the brain of a unique hERG isoform modulates treatment response in patients with schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry 2012; 169:725–734LinkGoogle Scholar

2 Huffaker SJ, Chen J, Nicodemus KK, Sambataro F, Yang F, Mattay V, Lipska BK, Hyde TM, Song J, Rujescu D, Giegling I, Mayilyan K, Proust MJ, Soghoyan A, Caforio G, Callicott JH, Bertolino A, Meyer-Lindenberg A, Chang J, Ji Y, Egan MF, Goldberg TE, Kleinman JE, Lu B, Weinberger DR: A primate-specific, brain isoform of KCNH2 affects cortical physiology, cognition, neuronal repolarization, and risk of schizophrenia. Nat Med 2009; 15:509–518Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

3 Nielsen J: The safety of atypical antipsychotics: does QTc provide all the answers? Expert Opin Drug Saf 2011; 10:341–344Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

4 Lieberman JA, Stroup TS, McEvoy JP, Swartz MS, Rosenheck RA, Perkins DO, Keefe RSE, Davis SM, Davis CE, Lebowitz BD, Severe J, Hsiao JKClinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness (CATIE) Investigators: Effectiveness of antipsychotic drugs in patients with chronic schizophrenia. N Engl J Med 2005; 353:1209–1223Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

5 Citrome L, Stroup TS: Schizophrenia, Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness (CATIE), and number needed to treat: how can CATIE inform clinicians? Int J Clin Pract 2006; 60:933–940Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar