The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×
Brief ReportFull Access

Gender Differences in the Symptoms of Major Depression in Opposite-Sex Dizygotic Twin Pairs

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Gender differences in the symptoms of major depression have received limited research attention. The aim of this study was to explore these differences in male-female twin pairs. METHOD: Telephone interviews were conducted to determine the lifetime history of major depression in 1,404 complete pairs of opposite-sex dizygotic twins identified through a population-based registry. From these, the authors selected 201 pairs in which both twins fulfilled the DSM-III-R criteria for lifetime major depression. Dichotomous symptom variables were analyzed by using McNemar’s chi-square. For continuous variables, conditional logistic regression was used. RESULTS: Female twins reported experiencing significantly more fatigue, hypersomnia, and psychomotor retardation during the most severe major depressive episode, whereas male twins reported more insomnia and agitation. CONCLUSIONS: In this group of matched twins, gender differences in the symptoms of major depression were seen in the areas of sleep, psychomotor changes, and fatigue. Gender significantly modifies some clinical features of major depression.

Major depression is a clinically heterogeneous disorder with varying symptom patterns. Gender differences in the symptoms of depression have received limited research attention. In this study we attempted to further clarify this issue by examining male-female dizygotic twin pairs in which both twins fulfilled the DSM-III-R criteria for lifetime major depression.

Women may have a higher prevalence of atypical symptoms of depression (1), defined in varying ways in the literature (2). Most studies indicate that, compared to men, women have increased appetite and weight gain (15); sleep disturbance (68); particularly hypersomnia (1, 3); fatigue (2, 8); and psychomotor retardation (2, 7, 9). Women also report more severe and/or a higher number of depressive symptoms, especially on self-report instruments (37, 9, 10). Men and women report similar severities of functional impairment (3, 5, 6, 9).

These studies have several potential limitations. First, with few exceptions (2, 3, 6, 8) the study groups have been those of convenience, with possibly different self-selection biases in men and women. Second, fewer men than women were enrolled in the studies, hence reducing the power of analysis. Third, in most studies, some evaluated symptoms were clustered, e.g., sleep disturbance instead of insomnia or hypersomnia.

To our knowledge, this is the first study examining gender differences in the symptoms of major depression in a matched, epidemiological sample (e.g., with same family of origin, age, social background, and to some extent, economic background) of dizygotic twin pairs.

Method

The twins examined in this article were from a project that studied white twins ascertained through the population-based Virginia Twin Registry. The participants ranged in age from 18 to 58 years, with a mean of 35.1 years (SD=9.2) at the time of the interview. The study was approved by the institutional Committee on the Conduct of Human Research. The procedure was fully explained to the participants, and oral informed consent followed by written consent was obtained. Out of 1,404 male-female dizygotic twin pairs interviewed by telephone, for this analysis we selected 201 in which both twins fulfilled the DSM-III-R criteria for major depression.

Lifetime major depression was assessed, with high interrater reliability (kappa=0.96), by structured psychiatric interview based on the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R (SCID) (11) with a modification to independently assess the presence of the 14 disaggregated symptoms (e.g., we separately recorded weight loss and weight gain) during the worst episode of major depression. The participants were also asked if the symptoms of depressed mood or anhedonia were the result of any physical illness, medications, or uncomplicated grief, and an affirmative answer precluded the diagnosis of major depression. Each interviewer had at least a master’s degree in social work, psychology, or another field related to mental health or a bachelor’s degree in one of these areas plus 2 years of clinical experience. The members of each twin pair were interviewed by different interviewers who were blind to co-twin diagnosis.

For dichotomous and continuous variables, McNemar’s chi-square analysis and conditional logistic regression were performed, respectively. The odds ratio as constructed here reflects the change in odds per unit change of the continuous measure so that the higher-scoring member of the pair is the female co-twin. Analyses were repeated after the age at onset and help-seeking behavior were controlled for as well. This study was exploratory in nature, and correction for multiple comparisons was not done.

Results

As seen in Table 1, women significantly more frequently reported symptoms of fatigue, hypersomnia, and psychomotor retardation, whereas men reported significantly more insomnia and agitation. Women also reported more depression-related help-seeking behavior, although the difference fell short of significance. There were no significant differences between men and women in appetite/weight change or impairment. These results did not change significantly after the age at onset and help-seeking behavior were controlled for.

Discussion

Our results are generally consistent with those in most previous studies. However, we did not find significantly greater appetite or weight increase in women than in men during a major depressive episode, a finding that is consistent with those in some (7, 9, 10) but not other (15) studies. Our observation cannot entirely be explained as an artifact of the effect of recall or measurement procedure because, like this study, most of the previous studies also used patient report. In one study in which actual weight measurements were available for study subjects (12), greater weight gain in women was observed, although the difference was not statistically significant.

There are many plausible explanations for the observed gender difference in major depression, ranging from the effects of recall, social roles and cultural norms, and adverse life events to different exposure to gonadal hormones, dysregulation of the adrenal axis, and genetic factors (13). These results may further substantiate our previous finding (14) that some genetic risk factors influencing liability to major depression in men and women might act differently.

The results of this study should be interpreted in the context of five potential methodological limitations. First, diagnostic assessment in this study group was completed by telephone. However, studies have shown little difference in the assessment of psychiatric disorders between telephone and face-to-face interviews (15). Second, because of its low prevalence and low reliability in general population samples (16), mania was not assessed in our male-female twin pairs. Therefore, in this analysis we could not distinguish persons with major depression from those with bipolar disorder. Third, we did not correct for multiple testing, and it is therefore possible that some of the reported significant findings reflect false positives. However, the overall pattern of results, five significant findings in 20 tests, is itself unlikely to occur by chance (p=0.002) (17), particularly when the results are mostly consistent with the previous research as well. Fourth, the study was not controlled for pregnancy- or menstruation-related mood changes or treatment received, particularly differential medication use by women (e.g., contraceptives) during the depressive episode. Fifth, all of the subjects were white, so the results cannot be extrapolated to other ethnic groups.

TABLE 1

Received Oct. 3, 2001; revisions received Feb. 5 and March 11, 2002; accepted March 25, 2002. From the Department of Psychiatry and Department of Human Genetics, Medical College of Virginia, Virginia Commonwealth University; and the Virginia Institute for Psychiatric and Behavioral Genetics, Richmond, Va. Address reprint requests to Dr. Khan, Medical College of Virginia, P.O. Box 980126, Richmond, VA 23298-0126; (e-mail). Supported by grant MH/AA-49492 from NIMH and the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism. The Mid-Atlantic Twin Registry has received support from NIH, the Carman Trust, and the W.M. Keck, John Templeton, and Robert Wood Johnson Foundations. Dr. Khan received the 2001 American Psychiatric Association/Lilly Resident Research Award for this paper. The authors thank the Virginia Twin Registry, now part of the Mid-Atlantic Twin Registry (directed by Drs. L. Corey and L. Murrelle), for its contribution to ascertainment of subjects for this study.

References

1. Benazzi F: Prevalence and clinical features of atypical depression in depressed outpatients: a 467-case study. Psychiatry Res 1999; 86:259-265Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

2. Kendler KS, Eaves LJ, Walters EE, Neale MC, Heath AC, Kessler RC: The identification and validation of distinct depressive syndromes in a population-based sample of female twins. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1996; 53:391-399Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

3. Ernst C, Angst J: The Zurich Study, XII: sex differences in depression: evidence from longitudinal epidemiological data. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 1992; 241:222-230Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

4. Frank E, Carpenter LL, Kupfer DJ: Sex differences in recurrent depression: are there any that are significant? Am J Psychiatry 1988; 145:41-45LinkGoogle Scholar

5. Young MA, Scheftner WA, Fawcett J, Klerman GL: Gender differences in the clinical features of unipolar major depressive disorder. J Nerv Ment Dis 1990; 178:200-203Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

6. Angst J, Dobler-Mikola A: Do the diagnostic criteria determine the sex ratio in depression? J Affect Disord 1984; 7:189-198Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

7. Kornstein SG, Schatzberg AF, Thase ME, Yonkers KA, McCullough JP, Keitner GI, Gelenberg AJ, Ryan CE, Hess AL, Harrison W, Davis SM, Keller MB: Gender differences in chronic major and double depression. J Affect Disord 2000; 60:1-11Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

8. Silverstein B: Gender difference in the prevalence of clinical depression: the role played by depression associated with somatic symptoms. Am J Psychiatry 1999; 156:480-482AbstractGoogle Scholar

9. Kornstein SG, Schatzberg AF, Yonkers KA, Thase ME, Keitner GI, Ryan CE, Schlager D: Gender differences in presentation of chronic major depression. Psychopharmacol Bull 1995; 31:711-718MedlineGoogle Scholar

10. Perugi G, Musetti L, Simonini E, Piagentini F, Cassano GB, Akiskal HS: Gender-mediated clinical features of depressive illness: the importance of temperamental differences. Br J Psychiatry 1990; 157:835-841Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

11. Spitzer RL, Williams JBW: Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R (SCID). New York, New York State Psychiatric Institute, Biometrics Research, 1985Google Scholar

12. Stunkard AJ, Fernstrom MH, Price A, Frank E, Kupfer DJ: Direction of weight change in recurrent depression: consistency across episodes. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1990; 47:857-860Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

13. Piccinelli M, Wilkinson G: Gender differences in depression: critical review. Br J Psychiatry 2000; 177:486-492Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

14. Kendler KS, Prescott CA: A population-based twin study of lifetime major depression in men and women. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1999; 56:39-44Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

15. Rohde P, Lewinsohn PM, Seeley JR: Comparability of telephone and face-to-face interviews in assessing axis I and II disorders. Am J Psychiatry 1997; 154:1593-1598LinkGoogle Scholar

16. Kessler RC, Rubinow DR, Holmes C, Abelson JM, Zhao S: The epidemiology of DSM-III-R bipolar I disorder in a general population survey. Psychol Med 1997; 27:1079-1089Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

17. Feild HS, Armenakis AA: On use of multiple tests of significance in psychological research. Psychol Rep 1974; 35:427-431CrossrefGoogle Scholar