Are lawyers enemies of psychiatrists? A survey of civil commitment counsel and judges
Abstract
The author surveyed 101 attorneys and judges involved in civil commitment procedures to answer the question of how they view psychiatrists, mental hospitals, and the mentally ill. She found that these lawyers and judges tended to view psychiatrists in favorable terms, that their attitudes toward mental hospitals reflected their perception of the weaknesses of these hospitals and their view of hospitalization as a last resort, and that they tended to reject negative statements about the mentally ill. She discusses the effect of these attitudes on the behavior of lawyers and judges toward psychiatrists and the mentally ill in civil commitment hearings.
Access content
To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.- Personal login
- Institutional Login
- Sign in via OpenAthens
- Register for access
-
Please login/register if you wish to pair your device and check access availability.
Not a subscriber?
PsychiatryOnline subscription options offer access to the DSM-5 library, books, journals, CME, and patient resources. This all-in-one virtual library provides psychiatrists and mental health professionals with key resources for diagnosis, treatment, research, and professional development.
Need more help? PsychiatryOnline Customer Service may be reached by emailing [email protected] or by calling 800-368-5777 (in the U.S.) or 703-907-7322 (outside the U.S.).
