ECT and special problems of informed consent
Abstract
The authors examine the question of whether severely depressed patients can validly consent to ECT, indeed whether anyone should be asked to consent to a treatment that some have held is disabling and beyond the range of rational choice. They suggest some clarification in the use of the terms "competent" and "rational." The authors present examples of cases where ECT may appropriately be used with and without a patient's consent. They conclude that except in cases in which patients may die without ECT, physicians will not err morally by respecting patients' informed decisions about treatment.
Access content
To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.- Personal login
- Institutional Login
- Sign in via OpenAthens
- Register for access
-
Please login/register if you wish to pair your device and check access availability.
Not a subscriber?
PsychiatryOnline subscription options offer access to the DSM-5 library, books, journals, CME, and patient resources. This all-in-one virtual library provides psychiatrists and mental health professionals with key resources for diagnosis, treatment, research, and professional development.
Need more help? PsychiatryOnline Customer Service may be reached by emailing [email protected] or by calling 800-368-5777 (in the U.S.) or 703-907-7322 (outside the U.S.).
