The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×
ArticleNo Access

THE RESPONSE OF SEVERELY ILL CHRONIC SCHIZOPHRENIC PATIENTS TO SOCIAL STIMULATION

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.118.4.311

Twenty-two long-stay severely ill male schizophrenic patients were employed in a hospital workshop for 16 weeks. They all lived in one villa where the standard of social treatment was high. The two workshop supervisors were a male and a female staff nurse. The sex of the supervisor did not influence the results. The conditions of supervision were varied experimentally. There was a sharp increase in output (on a simple sleeve folding task) whenever social incentives were introduced, and a sharp fall whenever passive conditions of supervision were resumed. The 10 patients with the highest initial output, together with 1 other (ranked 13 on initial output), accounted for over 90% of the output under passive conditions, and for all the improvement due to practice. However, they contributed only 40% of the improvement due to additional social incentives. The remaining patients, therefore, functioned at a very low level relative to the initially high scorers and showed no practice effect, but 7 of them responded very markedly to encouragement. Time-sampling of workshop behaviour showed that the increase in working activity, under active conditions of supervision, was accompanied by a significant decrease in various abnormalities of behaviour (immobility, mannerisms and restlessness). Ward behaviour was unaffected.

Access content

To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.