The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×
Communications and UpdatesFull Access

Natural Antiviral Cellular Defense in Relation to Positive and Negative Symptoms of Schizophrenia?

To the Editor: The review article by Alan S. Brown, M.D., M.P.H., and Elena J. Derkits, B.A. (1), published in the March 2010 issue of the Journal, provided further evidence of a possible role of prenatal infection and maternal immune response in the etiology of schizophrenia. The authors also emphasized the importance of gene-environment interplay in neurodevelopmental disturbance leading to schizophrenia. However, the hypothesis of the single prenatal viral or immunological effect on the developing brain as a predisposing factor to schizophrenia cannot explain the variable long-term course of the illness.

A recent discovery of intracellular RNA-based gene inactivation machinery (short interfering RNA-induced silen cing complex) (2) suggested a mechanism of the natural defense against neurotropic viruses. RNA-induced silencing complex is the natural mechanism that prevents viruses from producing functional proteins. Such cellular defense can inhibit production of HIV and poliovirus (23). In some cases, the viral infection can be cleared; in other cases a virus can escape (4).

A hypothetical genetic variation in RNA-induced silencing complex may explain a variability of illness progression in schizophrenia: in some affected individuals, RNA-induced silencing complex controls an expression of schizovirus, while in others genetic polymorphism in RNA-induced silencing complex may lead to overstimulation of the cellular defense with temporary silencing of both schizoviral RNA and some host cell RNAs. Such dysregulation in the RNA-induced silencing complex response may increase dopamine production in affected neurons and lead to transient positive symptoms of schizophrenia, a clinical presentation consistent with “cycloid psychosis”(5). In some other patients, the underresponsive defense leads to a fast progression of neuronal damage and early development of deficit schizophrenia (6). In a majority of cases, overstimulation of RNA-induced silencing complex and eventual viral escape from the short interfering RNA inhibition is represented by often intermittent positive psychotic symptoms and progression of negative symptoms. Thus, suggested polymorphisms in the RNA-induced silencing complex genes may be related to genetic vulnerability to schizophrenia and a progression of the disease.

There is a lack of studies of RNA-induced silencing complex activity in humans. It is tempting, however, to suggest that a study of intracellular RNA defense may help to identify infectious agents, predisposing to schizophrenia, and that a development of short interfering RNA therapy may potentially cure some schizophrenia spectrum disorders.

Charleston, S.C.

accepted for publication in June 2010

The author reports no financial relationships with commercial interests.

References

1. Brown AS , Derkits EJ: Prenatal infection and schizophrenia: a review of epidemiologic and translational studies. Am J Psychiatry 2010; 167:261–280LinkGoogle Scholar

2. Gitlin L , Karelsky S , Andino R: Short interfering RNA confers intracellular antiviral immunity in human cells. Nature 2002; 418:430–434Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

3. Hu WY , Myers CP , Kilzer JM , Pfaff SL , Bushman FD: Inhibition of retroviral pathogenesis by RNA interference. Curr Biol 2002; 12:1301–1311Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

4. Gitlin L , Stone JK , Andino R: Poliovirus escape from RNA interference: short interfering RNA-target recognition and implications for therapeutic approaches. J Virol 2005; 79:1027–1035Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

5. Salvatore P , Bhuvaneswar C , Ebert D , Maggini C , Baldessarini RJ: Cycloid psychoses revisited: case reports, literature review, and commentary. Harv Rev Psychiatry2008; 16:167–180Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

6. Kirkpatrick B , Galderisi S: Deficit schizophrenia: an update. World Psychiatry 2008; 7:143–147Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar