The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×
Letter to the EditorFull Access

Antidepressants for Bipolar Depression

To the Editor: The review of antidepressants for bipolar depression by Dr. Gijsman et al. provided an excellent overview of the randomized, controlled trials in the literature. However, the presented data all reflect acute antidepressant treatment response, with the longest study duration (10 weeks). Bipolar disorder is a chronic, relapsing condition, with an etiology likely distinct from that of unipolar depressive disorder, for which current antidepressants were specifically developed. Treatment approaches applied to alleviate symptoms during acute exacerbations may have significant impact on the long-term course of the illness. The authors did not present evidence that the long-term outcomes are favorable with antidepressant treatment; thus, their conclusion to challenge the APA practice guideline for recommending lithium or lamotrigine as first-line treatment for bipolar depression is unfounded.

There are long-term (of 11–24 months) prospective, placebo-controlled (13), naturalistic prospective (4, 5), and retrospective studies (6)—excluded categorically from the current review—showing that antidepressant exposure is associated with worse long-term outcomes in patients with bipolar disorder, apart from the concern for acute mania. Developing treatment guidelines requires an integration of all available data.

The question of whether bipolar depression responds best to adding a mood stabilizer or an antidepressant may be amenable to investigation by a long-term practical clinical trial. This model of structuring studies to compare relevant alternative interventions in diverse, real-life patient populations and practice settings is gaining support from research decision makers. Current data on antidepressants in bipolar depression do not justify changing the APA treatment guidelines.

References

1. Quitkin FM, Kane J, Rifkin A, Ramos-Lorenzi JR, Nayak DV: Prophylactic lithium carbonate with and without imipramine for bipolar I patients: a double-blind study. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1981; 38:902–907Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

2. Kane JM, Quitkin FM, Rifkin A, Ramos-Lorenzi JR, Nayak DD, Howard A: Lithium carbonate and imipramine in the prophylaxis of unipolar and bipolar II illness: a prospective, placebo-controlled comparison. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1982; 39:1065–1069Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

3. Prien RF, Kupfer DJ, Mansky PA, Small JG, Tuason VB, Voss CB, Johnson WE: Drug therapy in the prevention of recurrences in unipolar and bipolar affective disorders: report of the NIMH Collaborative Study Group comparing lithium carbonate, imipramine, and a lithium carbonate-imipramine combination. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1984; 41:1095–1104CrossrefGoogle Scholar

4. Altshuler LL, Post RM, Leverich GS, Mikalauskas K, Rosoff A, Ackerman L: Antidepressant-induced mania and cycle acceleration: a controversy revisited. Am J Psychiatry 1995; 152:1130–1138LinkGoogle Scholar

5. Ghaemi SN, Boiman EE, Goodwin FK: Diagnosing bipolar disorder and the effect of antidepressants: a naturalistic study. J Clin Psychiatry 2000; 61:804–808Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

6. Ghaemi SN, Rosenquist KJ, Ko JY, Baldassano CF, Kontos NJ, Baldessarini RJ: Antidepressant treatment in bipolar versus unipolar depression. Am J Psychiatry 2004; 161:163–165LinkGoogle Scholar