Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Email this article to a Colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to My Articles & Searches Download to citation manager Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Articles by Weissman, M. M. Articles by Fuentes, M. Search for Related Content PubMed Citation Articles by Weissman, M. M. Articles by Fuentes, M. Primary Care Other Diagnostic Tools Symptoms/Dimensions

A Comparison of Three Scales for Assessing Social Functioning in Primary Care

OBJECTIVE: Assessment of functional status is increasingly important in clinical trials and outcome research. Although several scales for assessing functioning are widely used, they vary in coverage, and direct comparisons among them are rare. Comparative information is useful in guiding selection of appropriate scales for research applications. METHOD: Results from three scales that measure functioning—the Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short-Form Health Survey, the Social Adjustment Scale Self-Report, and the Social Adaptation Self-Evaluation Scale—were compared in a consecutively selected sample of 211 patients coming to primary care. Patients also received psychiatric assessments. RESULTS: All three scales were acceptable to patients, showed few significant correlations with demographic variables, and were able to differentiate psychiatrically ill and well patients. Correlations among scales, even among scale items that assessed similar domains of functioning, were modest. CONCLUSIONS: Although all three scales are presumed to assess functional status, their item content and coverage differ. Selection of a scale requires a review of the scale items and consideration of research priorities and the characteristics of the study group. If functional status is a critical outcome measure, use of more than one scale may be necessary.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. M. Weissman, P. Wickramaratne, Y. Nomura, V. Warner, D. Pilowsky, and H. Verdeli Offspring of Depressed Parents: 20 Years Later Am J Psychiatry, June 1, 2006; 163(6): 1001 - 1008. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Ormel, A. J. Oldehinkel, W. A. Nolen, and W. Vollebergh Psychosocial Disability Before, During, and After a Major Depressive Episode: A 3-Wave Population-Based Study of State, Scar, and Trait Effects Arch Gen Psychiatry, April 1, 2004; 61(4): 387 - 392. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. H. Melley, T. F. Oltmanns, and E. Turkheimer The Schedule for Nonadaptive and Adaptive Personality (Snap): Temporal Stability and Predictive Validity of the Diagnostic Scales Assessment, June 1, 2002; 9(2): 181 - 187. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. Gross, M. Olfson, M. Gameroff, S. Shea, A. Feder, M. Fuentes, R. Lantigua, and M. M. Weissman Borderline Personality Disorder in Primary Care Arch Intern Med, January 14, 2002; 162(1): 53 - 60. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Feder, M. Olfson, M. Gameroff, M. Fuentes, S. Shea, R. A. Lantigua, and M. M. Weissman Medically Unexplained Symptoms in an Urban General Medicine Practice Psychosomatics, June 1, 2001; 42(3): 261 - 268. [Abstract] [Full Text]

Get information about faster international access.

Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2001 American Psychiatric Association. All rights reserved.

Home | Search | Current Issue | Past Issues | Subscribe | All APPI Journals | Help | Contact Us