The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×
Communications and UpdatesFull Access

Limitations of Computerized Adaptive Testing For Anxiety

To the Editor: The Computerized Adaptive Testing–Anxiety Inventory (CAT-ANX) was introduced as a new “test for anxiety,” with suggested large-scale screening uses and planned commercial availability (1). This proposed use lacks sufficient validation. The pool of over 400 items has not been demonstrated to have construct validity or predictive validity. The resultant CAT-ANX was not validated against existing anxiety scales. Test-retest reliability was not demonstrated. The “anxiety” of CAT-ANX was not defined. It is not coterminous with generalized anxiety disorder, although the article focused on this disorder. Operationally, CAT-ANX draws from many disparate disorders to pool multiform symptoms under the label “anxiety.” Justification for using CAT-ANX dimensional results in diagnosis was attempted through “diagnostic screening” for generalized anxiety disorder, with only modest success. At the preferred threshold score, sensitivity in the full development sample was 0.67 and specificity was 0.87. In epidemiologic studies, where generalized anxiety disorder prevalence is 3%, 86% of positive screens then would be false-positive, while 99% of negative screens would be true-negative. The limitations of dimensional CAT-ANX measures are apparent in Table 3 in the article (1). For patient 1 with “mild anxiety,” generalized anxiety disorder probability was 0.458, not clearly ruling in or ruling out the diagnosis, while the 40th percentile ranking relative to patients with verified generalized anxiety disorder diagnoses was quite consistent with caseness. Patient 2 with “severe anxiety” was said to have 99% probability of generalized anxiety disorder. However, the item responses suggest severe panic disorder with agoraphobia and/or social anxiety disorder, not generalized anxiety disorder. DSM-5 diagnosis was not reported for either case. The data in the article thus provide no sound basis to say that screening with CAT-ANX will allow confident, rapid, and accurate positive identification of key clinical anxiety diagnoses.

From the Pacific Behavioral Research Foundation, Carmel, Calif.

Dr. Carroll receives royalties from licensing the Brief Carroll Depression Scale and the Carroll Depression Scale–Revised to Multi-Health Systems, Inc. (www.mhs.com). Dr. Carroll also is the co-author of the unpublished, privately circulated Carroll-Davidson Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale (CD-GAD).

Reference

1 Gibbons RD, Weiss DJ, Pilkonis PA, Frank E, Moore T, Kim JB, Kupfer DJ: Development of the CAT-ANX: a computerized adaptive test for anxiety. Am J Psychiatry 2014; 171:187–194LinkGoogle Scholar