The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×
Published Online:

To the Editor: We thank Drs. Sule and Kelly for their comments on our article and appreciate the opportunity to respond to their letter. A number of studies have found an association between antisocial personality disorder, substance use disorders, and PTSD. Nonetheless, we believe that our findings are unlikely to be confounded by antisocial personality disorder. First, antisocial personality disorder is an unreliable diagnosis, particularly among people with substance use disorders (1 , 2) . A diagnosis of antisocial personality disorder is based on behaviors often associated with drug use (e.g., criminality and social deviance) (3) . As such, it is difficult to distinguish “true psychopaths” (whose behaviors are driven by psychopathology) from “symptomatic psychopaths” (whose behaviors are driven by their drug use) (2 , 4) . Second, although it is true that antisocial personality disorder has been associated with considerable harm, when borderline personality disorder is controlled, the harms attributable to antisocial personality disorder disappear (1) . Finally, not one single respondent to the Australian National Survey of Mental Health and Well-Being screened positive for dissocial personality disorder (5) ; hence, it could not be controlled for in our study. This is unlikely because of the absence of the disorder in the Australian general population, but rather because of methodological limitations (5 , 6) and/or problems inherent in the operationalization of the disorder. We hope that our article, as well as the letter by Drs. Sule and Kelly, will contribute to future research in this area.

Randwick, Australia
References

1. Darke S, Williamson A, Ross J, Teesson M, Lynskey M: Borderline personality disorder, antisocial personality disorder and risk-taking among heroin users: findings from the Australian Treatment Outcome Study. Drug Alcohol Depend 2004; 74:77–83Google Scholar

2. Darke S, Kaye S, Finlay-Jones R: Antisocial personality disorder, psychopathy and injecting drug use. Drug Alcohol Depend 1998; 52:63–69Google Scholar

3. Hare RD: A research scale for the assessment of psychopathy in criminal populations. Person Individ Dif 1980; 1:111–119Google Scholar

4. Gerstley LJ, Alterman AI, McLellan AT, Woody GE: Antisocial personality disorder in patients with substance abuse disorders: a problematic diagnosis? Am J Psychiatry 1990; 147:173–177Google Scholar

5. Jackson HJ, Burgess PM: Personality disorders in the community: a report from the Australian National Survey of Mental Health and Wellbeing. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2000; 35:531–538Google Scholar

6. Lewin TJ, Slade T, Andrews G, Carr VJ, Hornabrook CW: Assessing personality disorders in a national mental health survey. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2005; 40:87–98Google Scholar