Skip main navigation
Close Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu

The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×
Back to table of contents
ArticlesFull Access

Leveraging Large-Scale Genetics of PTSD and Cardiovascular Disease to Demonstrate Robust Shared Risk and Improve Risk Prediction Accuracy

Published Online:7 Sep 2022https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.21111113

Abstract

Objective:

Individuals with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) are significantly more likely to be diagnosed with cardiovascular disease (CVD) (e.g., myocardial infarction, stroke). The evidence for this link is so compelling that the National Institutes of Health convened a working group to determine gaps in the literature, including the need for large-scale genomic studies to identify shared genetic risk. The aim of the present study was to address some of these gaps by utilizing PTSD and CVD genome-wide association study (GWAS) summary statistics in a large biobank sample to determine the shared genetic risk of PTSD and CVD.

Methods:

A large health care biobank data set was used (N=36,412), combined with GWAS summary statistics from publicly available large-scale PTSD and CVD studies. Disease phenotypes (e.g., PTSD) were collected from electronic health records. De-identified genetic data from the biobank were genotyped using Illumina SNP array. Summary statistics data sets were processed with the following quality-control criteria: 1) SNP heritability h2 >0.05, 2) compute z-statistics (z=beta/SE or z=log(OR)/SE), 3) filter nonvariable SNPs (0<freq<1), and 4) filter SNPs with low number of samples. The multitrait analysis of GWAS (MTAG) approach was used to combine GWAS summary statistics.

Results:

Significant genetic correlations were found between PTSD and CVD (rG=0.24, SE=0.06), and Mendelian randomization analyses indicated a potential causal link from PTSD to hypertension (β=0.20, SE=0.04), but not the reverse. PTSD summary statistics significantly predicted PTSD diagnostic status (R2=0.27), and this was significantly improved by incorporating summary statistics from CVD and major depressive disorder (R2=1.30). Further, pathway enrichment analyses indicated that genetic variants involved in shared PTSD-CVD risk included those involved in postsynaptic structure, synapse organization, and interleukin-7-mediated signaling pathways.

Conclusions:

The results from this study suggest that PTSD and CVD may share genetic risk. Further, these results implicate PTSD as a risk factor leading to the development of hypertension and coronary artery disease. Additional research is needed to determine the clinical utility of these findings.