The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×

To the Editor: We read the study by Dr. Suppes et al. (1) with a great deal of interest and wish to raise concerns about the methodology. The authors evaluated the efficacy and safety of the combination of quetiapine with lithium or divalproex relative to monotherapy with lithium or semisodium valproate in maintenance treatment for patients with bipolar I disorder.

Randomized controlled trials are usually cited as the gold standard for detecting the efficacy of results. However, they often can be flawed in design and are not immune to bias.

First, in this study, 1,953 patients received open-label quetiapine. However, only 628 patients were randomly allocated for maintenance treatment. This indicates that only one-third of the patients were selected for maintenance therapy, which raises the possibility of selection bias. In this regard, Healy (2) stated that company sponsored clinical trials invariably recruit samples of convenience, which by definition do not actually sustain extrapolation to normal clinical practice.

Second, the authors used a wide range of exclusion and restricted inclusion criteria, which minimized the generalizability of the results.

Finally, although both arms received active treatment, the authors failed to perform power calculation, and they did not justify the sample size, which is also a requirement of the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials guidelines (3) .

We would appreciate clarification of these issues raised.

Coventry, United Kingdom

The authors report no competing interests.

This letter (doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2009.09050700) was accepted for publication in July 2009.

References

1. Suppes T, Vieta E, Liu S, Brecher M, Paulsson B: Maintenance treatment for patients with bipolar I disorder: results from a North American study of quetiapine in combination with lithium or divalproex (trial 127). Am J Psychiatry 2009; 166:476–488Google Scholar

2. Healy D: Evidence biased psychiatry? Psychiatr Bull 2001; 25:290–291Google Scholar

3. Begg C, Cho M, Eastwood S: Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials: the CONSORT statement. JAMA 1996; 276:637–639Google Scholar