The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×

Civil commitment statutes authorize involuntary psychiatric hospitalization in many countries. However, a pandemic disrupts the balance of ethical principles for involuntary hospitalization. Some patients will continue to require and to benefit from involuntary psychiatric care during a pandemic, but involuntary hospitalization also brings unique risks of infectious disease transmission that warrant consideration. In addition, changes to inpatient policies geared toward mitigating transmission risks may shape the effectiveness of involuntary care. Using a framework of four ethical principles—autonomy, nonmaleficence, beneficence, and justice—this article examines the shifting ethics of involuntary psychiatric hospitalization during the COVID-19 pandemic and offers suggestions for clinicians navigating these ethical dilemmas.