LEGAL RESPONSIBILITY AND CHRONIC ALCOHOLISM
Abstract
A review of legal opinions reveals conflicting attitudes toward the intoxicated civil or criminal offender. Traditionally the courts have dealt harshly with him, assuming that the intoxicated person chooses his condition and must suffer the consequences. This harshness is undergoing moderation, especially in criminal cases where intent is a necessary part.
Since crime and other forms of antisocial behavior are so often associated with intoxication, many would view any significant increase in permissiveness toward the intoxicated offender as dangerous to society. Others feel the rights of the offender must be considered also and do not feel these are being given adequate attention at this time.
If intoxication is a result of the illness of alcoholism in a particular case, the medical rights of the person must be considered and he should have his medical condition brought before the court as a possible mitigating factor. The court should then act to bring the alcoholic offender to enforced treatment rather than punishing him. Failure to profit from treatment would then result in some degree of quarantine for the protection of society.
Access content
To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.- Personal login
- Institutional Login
- Sign in via OpenAthens
- Register for access
-
Please login/register if you wish to pair your device and check access availability.
Not a subscriber?
PsychiatryOnline subscription options offer access to the DSM-5 library, books, journals, CME, and patient resources. This all-in-one virtual library provides psychiatrists and mental health professionals with key resources for diagnosis, treatment, research, and professional development.
Need more help? PsychiatryOnline Customer Service may be reached by emailing [email protected] or by calling 800-368-5777 (in the U.S.) or 703-907-7322 (outside the U.S.).