The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×
Site maintenance Monday, July 8th, 2024. Please note that access to some content and account information will be unavailable on this date.
ArticleNo Access

FRONTAL LOBOTOMY 1936-1956 A FOLLOW-UP STUDY OF 3000 PATIENTS FROM ONE TO TWENTY YEARS

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.113.10.877

Three thousand lobotomy patients have been compared in 3 different categories: (1) Prefrontal lobotomy versus transorbital lobotomy; (2) private patients versus state hospital patients; (3) according to personality reaction type, schizophrenic, affective and psychoneurotic.

Follow-up studies reveal that following prefrontal lobotomy some 70% of schizophrenics, 80% of affectives, and 90% of psychoneurotics are functioning outside of the hospital in the 5-to 10-year period. This figure is twice as high in private patients as it is in state hospital patients.

Transorbital lobotomy is safer, more effective (with the exception of the hallucinated schizophrenic patients), and far more applicable to the problem of the state hospital, than is prefrontal lobotomy. [see table 2 in source pdf]

Multiple operations have been performed in about 1 patient in 10, with eventual satisfactory results in a third of them. When it is considered that this fraction amounts to 100 patients out of the hospital, this figure acquires significance.

Hospitals that select patients for operation with a view to release, and that encourage the relatives of patients to participate actively in the management of convalescence, enjoy a much higher percentage of released patients than do those that employ lobotomy more for the control of disturbed behavior.

Access content

To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.