The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×
Site maintenance Monday, July 8th, 2024. Please note that access to some content and account information will be unavailable on this date.
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.108.2.91

This paper describes the utilization of 2 psychological tests (Revised Beta Examination and Multiple Choice Rorschach) in the prediction of successful psychiatric aides. Psychiatric aides, 113 in number, were first classified into good and poor employees. Psychological tests were unsuccessful in discriminating between these 2 groups. However, when these 2 groups were refined into a definitely good group and a definitely poor group by eliminating marginal employees, psychological tests selected 32% of these very poor employees while only 5% of the very good employees were falsely identified. An attempt was also made to identify the charge attendant group but this was unsuccessful. Present findings indicate that further research utilizing a more extensive battery of psychological tests should lead to even more fruitful results in the problem of selection and placement of psychiatric aides.

Access content

To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.