The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.




Recent studies suggest that altered function of higher-order appetitive neural circuitry may contribute to restricted eating in anorexia nervosa and overeating in bulimia nervosa. This study used sweet tastes to interrogate gustatory neurocircuitry involving the anterior insula and related regions that modulate sensory-interoceptive-reward signals in response to palatable foods.


Participants who had recovered from anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa were studied to avoid confounding effects of altered nutritional state. Functional MRI measured brain response to repeated tastes of sucrose and sucralose to disentangle neural processing of caloric and noncaloric sweet tastes. Whole-brain functional analysis was constrained to anatomical regions of interest.


Relative to matched comparison women (N=14), women recovered from anorexia nervosa (N=14) had significantly diminished and women recovered from bulimia nervosa (N=14) had significantly elevated hemodynamic response to tastes of sucrose in the right anterior insula. Anterior insula response to sucrose compared with sucralose was exaggerated in the recovered group (lower in women recovered from anorexia nervosa and higher in women recovered from bulimia nervosa).


The anterior insula integrates sensory reward aspects of taste in the service of nutritional homeostasis. One possibility is that restricted eating and weight loss occur in anorexia nervosa because of a failure to accurately recognize hunger signals, whereas overeating in bulimia nervosa could represent an exaggerated perception of hunger signals. This response may reflect the altered calibration of signals related to sweet taste and the caloric content of food and may offer a pathway to novel and more effective treatments.

Anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa are disorders of unknown etiology that tend to affect young women. They are characterized by extreme eating behavior and distorted body image and have high rates of chronicity, morbidity, and mortality. Several lines of evidence implicate genetically mediated neurobiological factors as contributing to the development of anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa (1, 2). However, a lack of understanding of the pathophysiology of these illnesses has hindered development of effective treatments.

How are individuals with anorexia nervosa able to consume a few hundred calories per day and maintain an extremely low weight for many years, when most people struggle to lose a few pounds? And why do individuals with bulimia nervosa, who are often of normal weight, binge on thousands of calories per day? Although both are categorized as eating disorders, it is unknown whether individuals with anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa have a primary disturbance of appetite regulation or whether pathological feeding behavior is secondary to other phenomena, such as an obsessional preoccupation with body image. Recent studies of obesity suggest that corticolimbic neural processes, which encode the rewarding, emotional, and cognitive aspects of food ingestion, can drive overconsumption of food, even in the presence of satiety and replete energy stores (3, 4).

To determine whether corticolimbic circuits are involved in appetite regulation in eating disorders, we interrogated the neural circuitry of gustatory processing, which integrates the sensory, hedonic, and motivational aspects of feeding, after a modest meal (Figure 1) (1, 4, 5). As Small has noted (6), this circuit can be assessed by using a sweet taste stimulus. Sweet taste perception is peripherally recognized by the tongue’s sweet taste receptors, from which signals are transmitted through the brainstem and thalamus to the primary gustatory cortex, which comprises the frontal operculum and anterior insula. The anterior insula and associated gustatory cortex respond to the taste and physical properties of food and may also respond to its rewarding value. The subgenual anterior cingulate cortex is linked to hypothalamic and brainstem pathways that mediate autonomic and visceral control. The orbitofrontal cortex is associated with flexible incentive responses to changing stimuli. These regions innervate a broad region of the rostral ventral-central striatum, where behavioral repertoires are computed based on these inputs.

FIGURE 1. Main-Effect Neural Activation During Sucrose Taste Processinga

a Taste pathway: chemoreceptors on the tongue detect the sweet taste. This signal is transmitted through the spinal cord and into the brainstem. The thalamus (purple) relays this information to the primary gustatory cortex, which is interconnected with the anterior insula (green). The anterior insula is a vital component of the ventral neurocircuit, or limbic system, through its connections with the amygdala (blue), the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC; turquoise), and the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC; yellow). Afferents from cortical structures involved in the ventral neurocircuit are directed to the ventral striatum (VS); cortical structures more involved in cognitive strategies, forming a dorsal neurocircuit that includes the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC; pink), send inputs to the dorsal striatum (DS). RAN=women recovered from anorexia nervosa; CW=comparison women; RBN=women recovered from bulimia nervosa.

When individuals with anorexia or bulimia nervosa are in an ill and symptomatic state, they have disturbances of most physiological systems. This confounds the determination of whether abnormal ill state findings are a cause or a consequence of starvation. In order to avoid confounding effects, we studied individuals recovered from restricting-type anorexia nervosa or bulimia nervosa and matched healthy comparison women. Approximately 50% of individuals who have anorexia and bulimia nervosa recover in the sense that their weight and nutritional status normalize (7), although persistent mild to moderate dysphoric mood, obsessional thoughts, and body image concerns are common (8). Because these symptoms are present in childhood, before the onset of the eating disorder, they may reflect traits that contribute to a vulnerability to develop anorexia or bulimia nervosa.

We used functional MRI (fMRI) and sweet taste administration to interrogate top-down sensory-interoceptive-reward processes. The whole-brain functional analysis was constrained to the anatomical regions of interest based on the Talairach atlas. We sought to replicate an earlier finding from our group (9) showing that women recovered from anorexia nervosa have reduced insula and striatal response to tastes of sucrose, which suggests diminished response of the sensory reward circuitry responsible for consummatory drive. Because individuals with bulimia nervosa have a drive to overconsume, we hypothesized that they would have an exaggerated response of sensory-reward circuitry.

It is possible that the brain differentially processes sweetness compared with the caloric content of sucrose. For example, the hypothalamus responds to the caloric content of sugar (10). Thus, the noncaloric sweet solution sucralose was chosen as a contrast condition because it is similar to sugar in taste, molecular makeup, and recognition by tongue sweet receptors (11) but lacks its caloric properties (12). Disentangling processes related to sweetness and those related to caloric content may help us understand why individuals with anorexia or bulimia nervosa have strong emotional responses to high-calorie foods.



We studied 14 women recovered from anorexia nervosa, 14 women recovered from bulimia nervosa, and 14 age- and weight-matched healthy comparison women (Table 1). Trained clinicians administered the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders (13) to assess inclusion and exclusion criteria and to characterize lifetime history of comorbid psychiatric disorders (for comorbidities, see the data supplement that accompanies the online edition of this article). Participants completed the Beck Depression Inventory (14) to assess depression, the Temperament and Character Inventory (15) to assess harm avoidance, and the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, form Y (16), to assess state and trait anxiety. Women recovered from anorexia nervosa had lost weight purely by restricting their diet and had no history of binge eating or purging. Women recovered from bulimia nervosa had a history of past binge eating and purging behaviors but had never been emaciated and had maintained an average body weight above 85% of ideal body weight. None of the participants had a previous history of both anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa. Recovered participants were required to have had no restrictive eating or other pathological eating-related behaviors in the preceding 12 months; a stable weight between 90% and 120% of ideal body weight for at least 12 months; regular menstrual cycles for the preceding 12 months; and normal concentrations of plasma β-hydroxybutyric acid glucose and insulin during the evaluation phase, as previously described (8). Comparison women had no history of an eating disorder or any other psychiatric disorder, no history of serious medical or neurological illness, and no first-degree relatives with an eating disorder, and they had been within normal weight range since menarche. All participants had normal menses and were studied during the early follicular phase of the menstrual cycle. Participants took no medications within 30 days before the study. After receiving a complete description of the study, all participants gave written informed consent. The University of California San Diego institutional review board approved the study.

TABLE 1. Demographic, Clinical, and Behavioral Data for Women Recovered From Anorexia Nervosa or Bulimia Nervosa and Healthy Comparison Women
Comparison Women
Women Recovered From Anorexia Nervosa
Women Recovered From Bulimia Nervosa
Age (years)27.45.527.31.426.65.7n.s.
Recovered (years)
Illness duration (years)
Body mass index (BMI)22.61.521.52.822.92.1n.s.
Low lifetime BMI20.41.314.92.619.71.9<0.001
High lifetime BMI23.01.623.
Harm avoidance score (Temperament and Character Inventory)1051321670.03
Depression score (Beck Depression Inventory)336154n.s.
State anxiety score (State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, form Y)2693023013n.s.
Trait anxiety score (State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, form Y)2893033113n.s.
Pleasantness rating of a 10% sucrose solution4.
Sucralose taste match (g)a1.

a Dose of sucralose that matched a 10% sucrose solution. While women recovered from anorexia nervosa (F=7.66, df=1, 27, p=0.010) and from bulimia nervosa (F=8.94, df=1, 27, p=0.006) required more sucralose to taste match with sucrose than comparison women, when asked after the fMRI scan, all participants reported that they were unable to distinguish between the sucrose and sucralose solutions.

TABLE 1. Demographic, Clinical, and Behavioral Data for Women Recovered From Anorexia Nervosa or Bulimia Nervosa and Healthy Comparison Women
Enlarge table

Imaging Procedures

Participants were instructed to fast overnight and to arrive at the fMRI facility between 7:00 and 8:00 a.m. They received a standardized breakfast of 604 calories before scanning to control for satiety state.

Taste Solution Delivery

Sucrose and sucralose solutions were delivered with a programmable syringe pump in 1 mL/second stimulations. Participants received 1 mL of either sugar or sucralose every 20 seconds for a total of 120 samples. Sweet tastes were matched for intensity and delivered in pseudorandomized order. (Additional methods, as well as other relevant issues, are described in the online data supplement.)

fMRI Acquisition

Scanning was performed on a 3-T GE Magnet, with a three-plane scout scan (16 seconds), a sagitally acquired spoiled gradient recalled sequence (T1-weighted, 172 slices, thickness=1 mm, TI=450 ms, TR=8 ms, TE=4 ms, flip angle=12°, FOV=250×250 mm, 192×256 matrix interpolated to 256×256), and T2*-weighted echo planar imaging scans to measure blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) functional activity during taste stimulation (3.43×3.43×2.6 mm voxels, TR=2 seconds, TE=30 ms, flip angle=90°, 32 axial slices, thickness=2.6 mm, gap=1.4 mm).

fMRI Preprocessing

Images were processed with the AFNI (Analysis of Functional Neuroimages) software package ( To minimize motion artifact, echo planar images were realigned to the 100th acquired scan. Additionally, data were time-corrected for slice acquisition order, and spikes in the hemodynamic time course were removed and replaced with an interpolated value from adjacent time points using 3dDespike. A multiple regression model was used whereby regressors derived from the experimental paradigm were convolved with a prototypical hemodynamic response function (AFNI command “waver”), including five nuisance regressors: three movement regressors to account for residual motion (roll, pitch, and yaw), and regressors for baseline and linear trends to account for signal drifts. To account for individual anatomical variations, a Gaussian filter with full width at half maximum 6.0 mm was applied to the voxel-wise percent signal change data. All functional data were normalized to Talairach coordinates.

fMRI Analysis

Single-sample t tests were performed on the main effects of sucrose and sucralose, and statistical maps were thresholded at a p value of 0.005. Both whole-brain and region-of-interest analyses were performed. The whole-brain analysis was thresholded at 2,048 mm3 (32 voxels) and masked to a priori regions of interest implicated in taste and reward processing (see Table S1 in the online data supplement). A threshold adjustment method based on Monte Carlo simulations was used to guard against identifying false positive areas of activation (AFNI program AlphaSim). Voxel-wise percent signal change data were entered into a group-by-condition (sucrose/sucralose) analysis of variance (ANOVA) test thresholded at a p value of 0.05. Percent signal change data from statistically derived regions of interest were used to assess correlation and regression analyses with behavioral data.


Participants’ demographic and behavioral data are summarized in Table 1. BOLD response was unrelated to lifetime psychiatric history.

Main-Effect Neural Activation During Sucrose Taste Processing

To confirm task-related activation of the main neural substrates that are known to process sweet taste (17), we examined activation in response to sucrose stimulation using a stimulus versus baseline voxel-based statistical contrast masked by a priori regions of interest that are engaged by taste circuitry. For all three groups, there was main-effect activation during sucrose administration (Figure 1, Table 2) in the ventroposterior nuclei of the thalamus, anterior insula, and pregenual anterior cingulate (Brodmann’s area 24/32). Main-effect activations were relatively similar for sucralose (Table 2). A whole-brain analysis was performed to investigate which regions outside the predetermined regions of interest also showed activation (data not shown). While the areas largely confirmed the region-of-interest analysis, additional areas of consistent activation were observed extending into the thalamus and in the prefrontal gyrus in the comparison group, and in left and right insula during sucralose stimulation in women recovered from bulimia nervosa (see Table S2 in the online data supplement).

TABLE 2. Main-Effect BOLD Signal Response to Sucrose and Sucralose in Regions of Interesta
Comparison Women
Women Recovered From Anorexia Nervosa
Women Recovered From Bulimia Nervosa
Condition and RegionVolume (mm3)VoxelsxyzVolume (mm3)VoxelsxyzVolume (mm3)Voxelsxyz
Middle frontal gyrus6401037352789614354125
Supragenual anterior cingulate cortex6,14496–24391,72827153816,2562544035
Middle frontal gyrus1,344213537268,3201303837
Supragenual anterior cingulate cortex11,84018524383,520552637

a BOLD=blood-oxygen-level-dependent. Thresholded at p<0.005 and a minimum cluster size of 8 contiguous voxels (512 mm3). The volume of each voxel is 64 mm3. Coordinates are for center of mass in Talairach space.

TABLE 2. Main-Effect BOLD Signal Response to Sucrose and Sucralose in Regions of Interesta
Enlarge table

Group-by-Condition Analysis

A significant group-by-condition interaction was identified, centered in the dorsal aspect of the right insula (F=10.72, df=2, 51, p<0.001) and the right dorsal caudate (F=8.91, df=2, 51, p=0.001) for a voxel-based ANOVA (p<0.05) masked by a priori regions of interest (Figure 2). Whole-brain analysis provided similar regions (see Table S2 in the online data supplement).

FIGURE 2. Group-by-Condition Interactions for Response to Sucrose and Sucralose in Women Recovered From Anorexia Nervosa or Bulimia Nervosa and Healthy Comparison Womena

a In panel A, regions of interest were defined by a one-way group-by-condition (p<0.05) analysis of variance. The centers of mass, with Talairach coordinates, were as follows: for region 1, the anterior insula (5,504 mm3, 86 voxels; 39, −2, 8); for region 2, the dorsal caudate (1,984 mm3, 31 voxels; 10, 9, 8); for region 3, the thalamus (1,088 mm3, 17 voxels; 12, −12, 12). In panel B, post hoc t tests in the right anterior and middle insula showed that response to sucrose was significantly less in women recovered from anorexia nervosa (RAN) relative to comparison women (CW) (**p<0.01) but significantly greater in women recovered from bulimia nervosa (RBN) relative to comparison women (*p<0.05). In panel C, post hoc t tests in the right dorsal caudate showed a decreased response to sucrose in women recovered from anorexia nervosa relative to comparison women that approached significance (p=0.079). No significant condition or group activation differences were observed in the right thalamus (region 3, data not shown). Error bars indicate standard deviations.

Right Insula and Dorsal Caudate Post Hoc Within-Condition Analysis

Tastes of sucrose corresponded with significantly decreased right anterior insula activation in women recovered from anorexia nervosa (F=7.79, df=1, 27, p=0.010) and increased activation in women recovered from bulimia nervosa (F=6.12, df=1, 27, p=0.020) relative to the comparison group (Figure 2B, Table 3). A similar activation pattern in response to the sucrose stimulus was observed in the right dorsal caudate. Although activation did not reach significance, it indicated a decreased response in women recovered from anorexia relative to the comparison group (F=3.35, df=1, 27, p=0.079) (Figure 2C, Table 3). Tastes of sucralose also corresponded with a significant decrease in right anterior insula activation (F=4.98, p=0.035) in women recovered from anorexia nervosa relative to the comparison group (Figure 2B, Table 3), while right anterior insula activation was similar between the women recovered from bulimia nervosa and the comparison women. The trend of a decreased right dorsal caudate response in women recovered from anorexia nervosa relative to comparison women (F=3.60, p=0.069) was also seen in the sucralose condition, while women recovered from bulimia nervosa showed a decreased but nonsignificant activation relative to comparison women (Figure 2C, Table 3).

TABLE 3. Summary of ANOVA Comparisons From the Right Anterior Insula and Right Dorsal Caudate in Healthy Comparison Women (CW), Women Recovered From Anorexia Nervosa (RAN), and Women Recovered From Bulimia Nervosa (RBN)a
Right Anterior InsulaRight Dorsal Caudate
Groups and ComparisonFpFp
Group-by-condition differences
CW, RAN, RBN10.72<0.0018.910.001
CW, RAN2.540.1230.020.905
CW, RBN8.920.00613.760.001
Sucrose-sucralose group differences
CW, RAN, RBN7.040.0022.090.138
CW, RAN4.460.0444.260.049
CW, RBN2.960.0970.280.601
Sucrose-only group differences
CW, RAN, RBN12.75<0.0012.860.069
CW, RAN7.790.0103.350.079
CW, RBN6.120.0200.280.601
Sucralose-only group differences
CW, RAN, RBN3.850.0302.240.121
CW, RAN4.980.0353.600.069
CW, RBN0.190.6662.300.141
Condition differences

a In the right anterior insula region defined by the group-by-condition contrast, response to sucralose was significantly lower in the recovered anorexia nervosa group relative to the healthy comparison group but was not significantly different between the comparison and recovered bulimia nervosa groups. Sucrose elicited greater blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) signal than sucralose for women in the recovered bulimia nervosa group in the right anterior insula, while the BOLD response was lower in sucrose compared with sucralose for those in the recovered anorexia nervosa group. The healthy comparison group showed no condition differences in the right anterior insula. In the right caudate region defined by the group-by-condition contrast, decreased sucralose response relative to the healthy comparison group did not reach significance in either the recovered anorexia nervosa group or the recovered bulimia nervosa group. Sucrose elicited greater BOLD signal than sucralose for women in the recovered bulimia nervosa group in the right caudate, while the BOLD response was lower in sucrose versus sucralose for women in both recovered groups.

TABLE 3. Summary of ANOVA Comparisons From the Right Anterior Insula and Right Dorsal Caudate in Healthy Comparison Women (CW), Women Recovered From Anorexia Nervosa (RAN), and Women Recovered From Bulimia Nervosa (RBN)a
Enlarge table

Comparison of Sucrose to Sucralose: Within-Group Analysis

When sucrose was compared with sucralose, women recovered from anorexia nervosa (F=10.13, df=1, 13, p=0.007) and bulimia nervosa (F=8.21, df=1, 13, p=0.013) demonstrated significant differences in the right anterior insula, but in opposite directions (anorexia nervosa: sucrose < sucralose; bulimia nervosa: sucrose > sucralose) (Table 3). The same difference and directionality were observed in the right dorsal caudate when comparing sucrose and sucralose in both women recovered from anorexia nervosa (F=7.91, df=1, 13, p=0.015) and bulimia nervosa (F=5.98, df=1, 13, p=0.030).

Behavioral Relationships

There were no significant brain-behavior relationships after correcting for multiple comparisons (see Table S3 in the online data supplement).


To our knowledge, this is the first fMRI study to compare sweet taste response between women recovered from anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa and comparison women. Within corticolimbic circuits involved in appetite regulation (Figure 1), we found that right anterior insula response to sucrose was diminished in women recovered from anorexia nervosa and exaggerated in women recovered from bulimia nervosa relative to comparison women.

Other studies investigating response to tastes of foods have shown abnormal insula response in anorexia nervosa. We replicated a previous study from our group that found that women recovered from anorexia nervosa had diminished hemodynamic response in the anterior insula to tastes of sucrose or water (9). Vocks et al. (18) compared hunger and satiety states while drinking chocolate milk and showed that, in the hungry state, patients with anorexia nervosa exhibited less insula activation than healthy comparison subjects.

The anterior insula is well established as the primary taste cortex (see the online data supplement), which integrates the sensation of taste with multiple bodily sensations to generate an “internal milieu” or the “interoceptive state” (6, 19). The anterior insula, as part of the limbic sensory cortex (20), is involved in representations of the hedonic state of the individual. Thus, altered neural signaling in the anterior insula could suggest a dysregulation of hedonic taste processing in individuals with eating disorders. Previous investigations have shown normal perception of sweet taste in patients with eating disorders (21). Instead, consistent with previous studies (21) (see the data supplement), our results of altered sweet taste preference support the hypothesis of altered neural representation of hedonic valuation in eating disorders.

The connectivity of the anterior insula with other brain areas that are important for reward-related processing implies that the emotional value of interoceptive cues, such as taste or feelings of hunger or fullness, are computed in the anterior insula (20). This brain area has been implicated in a contextualized representation of the “feeling” self in time and with respect to maintenance of a homeostatic state. For example, a current state, such as food deprivation, is compared with a previous state of homeostasis, and this information is then integrated in the formation of emotions (22, 23). Sweet tastes, such as those delivered in our study, are processed against this “interoceptive-hedonic” backdrop.

Brain imaging studies giving tastes of sugar to healthy individuals in food-deprived compared with satiated states have consistently shown that receipt of sucrose in the food deprivation state results in relatively higher activation in the insula and orbitofrontal cortex, potentially reflecting perceived change in interoceptive state (24) (see the data supplement). In the present study, we fed subjects a modest meal before fMRI scanning and thus did not test extremes of feeding or food deprivation. Still, these data raise clinically relevant questions with regard to how symptoms in eating disorders may be related to erroneous interoceptive feedback. The relatively lower activation of insula signal in individuals recovered from anorexia nervosa suggests a signal consistent with relatively high satiation. Attenuated anterior insula activation in anorexia nervosa could therefore reflect a hunger signal that is attenuated compared with the fed state. In a clinically ill population, the attenuated signal associated with sweet taste may not provide a sufficient learning signal to change behavior (e.g., eating more in the state of food deprivation), resulting in a rigid behavioral phenotype.

From another perspective, individuals with anorexia nervosa may simply fail to accurately recognize hunger because of altered homeostatic interoceptive signals. There might be a discrepancy between their perceived internal body state (full, bloated) and their actual internal body state (calorie-deficient) causing them to avoid food when internal cues should in fact be driving them to eat. In contrast, based on data from healthy subjects (24), the relatively higher insula activation in our participants who had recovered from bulimia nervosa may be consistent with the opposite: exaggerated hedonic response to sweet taste together with an interoceptive status of relative hunger. Increased anterior insula activation in bulimia nervosa could represent an exaggerated interoceptive perception of hunger/deprivation signal, which may mutually amplify the reward and homeostatic systems, leading to excessive episodic food intake. While not investigated in this study, it is also possible that other eating disorder symptoms, such as body image distortion, alexithymia, and lack of insight and motivation to change, could be part of a more generalized disturbance related to interoceptive processing (9).

Dorsal Caudate Response

Our study demonstrated a trend toward reduced dorsal caudate response to tastes of sucrose and sucralose in women recovered from anorexia nervosa. This parallels the insula findings and is in accordance with previous work showing that women recovered from anorexia had diminished hemodynamic response to tastes of sucrose and water bilaterally in the dorsal caudate, dorsal putamen, and ventral putamen (9). Another study in women recovered from bulimia nervosa (25) showed an exaggerated anterior ventral striatum response for a cream/water contrast compared with women recovered from anorexia nervosa and healthy comparison women. The striatum receives direct inputs from the insula (26, 27), and this path is thought to mediate eating behavior, which may have a direct impact on the types of palatable foods avoided or overconsumed in eating disorders (28). These striatal findings, in conjunction with insula alterations, raise the possibility that there may be a disturbance in the mechanisms translating interoceptive signals into enhanced or diminished motivated eating.

Sweetness Versus Energy Content of Sucrose

Women recovered from anorexia or bulimia nervosa also showed differences in response to sucrose and sucralose in the right anterior insula and right dorsal caudate. No group showed hypothalamic differences. In the right anterior insula, women recovered from anorexia nervosa showed greater response to sucrose than to sucralose, while women recovered from bulimia nervosa showed greater response to sucralose than to sucrose (data not shown). This suggests that sucralose as a contrast solution distinguished between processing of caloric and noncaloric sweet tastes. In contrast, for comparison women, sucrose was similar to sucralose in the anterior insula, and sucralose showed greater activation in the caudate. A previous analysis of data from healthy subjects (29) supports the speculation (30) that sucrose, through effects on insula signaling, may result in changes of dopamine transmission that could modify the relative association of the energy value of sucrose to its motivational value. These findings raise the possibility that individuals with anorexia or bulimia nervosa have altered balance or sensitivity regarding mechanisms that signal the caloric content of foods as opposed to gustatory pathways that code the sweetness of foods.


The study of eating disorders frequently raises questions regarding cause and consequence: Do neurobiological disturbances cause pathological eating behaviors, or are neurobiological disturbances secondary to abnormal nutrition? Our literature review reveals some consistency of results in ill and recovered individuals with eating disorders, suggesting that these findings could be traits, but there is sparse evidence from direct comparisons using the same design, and no longitudinal studies have been reported. Even if persistent psychophysiological disturbances in recovered eating disorders are “scars,” they are still likely to help us understand the processes contributing to these disorders. These ideas could be tested in children at risk for eating disorders, to see if these neural signatures are predictive of illness development. It should be noted that there are discrepant insula findings in other gustatory studies (3134) that might be related to anticipatory responses (35) (see the online data supplement). Our study task did not include an explicit expectation phase, which may contribute to some discrepant results across studies. Other fMRI studies of appetite in eating disorders have employed designs that used pictures of food or food words (36, 37). Pictures may elicit different brain responses, so this literature is not examined here. Artificial sweeteners are not identical to sugars in terms of how they activate tongue sweet receptors (38) (see the data supplement). It is possible that a mismatch in sweetness, rather than added caloric content, contributed to the observed differences between sucrose and sucralose. The use of atlas-based region-of-interest analysis may limit the capacity to detect signal in regions where recovered individuals show differences in brain structure (39). Although the Gaussian filter that was applied helps correct for some level of individual differences in brain structure, an attenuated or absent effect may represent a false negative resulting from group deviations from the standardized atlas. While the sample size of each cohort was relatively modest, the findings were robust. Compared with other behavioral disorders, eating disorders are characterized by homogeneous symptoms, so that smaller samples may be adequate to show group differences.

Treatment Implications

Aberrant function of the right anterior insula, which integrates gustatory stimuli and interoceptive/hedonic signals, may contribute to a failure of higher-order appetitive processes to reach homeostasis and thus lead to pathological eating behaviors. Attenuated anterior insula response in anorexia nervosa and exaggerated insula activity in bulimia nervosa raise the possibility that these disorders comprise, respectively, an overly rigid or highly unstable neural representation of internal feeling states at the junction of feeding and, possibly, emotive decision making. Identifying abnormal neural substrates in these individuals helps to reformulate the basic pathology of eating disorders and offers targets for novel approaches to treatments. It may be possible to modulate the experience by enhancing insula reactivity when individuals with anorexia nervosa engage in eating behavior, or dampening exaggerated or possibly unstable responses to food in individuals with bulimia nervosa. One approach is the use of techniques that might “train” the insular cortex. Studies have shown that healthy subjects can use real-time fMRI to control right anterior insula activity (40). Biofeedback might also be useful since there is evidence that it helps individuals with anxiety disorders observe inaccuracies in perceiving physiological activity or strengthen perception when actual somatic changes occur (41).

It may also be possible to modify existing therapies so they can better target eating disorder psychopathology. For example, it may be possible to behaviorally modulate the insula by increasing the influence of top-down modulation—that is, inhibit the urge to eat in bulimic individuals by employing cognitive training. Alternatively, studies suggest that mindfulness training alters cortical representations of interoceptive attention (42, 43), or a dialectical behavioral therapy approach may be used to promote development of more effective strategies for recognizing, predicting, and constructively managing tendencies to have rigid or unstable responses to stimuli.

From another perspective, if individuals with anorexia nervosa have an overly active satiety signal in response to palatable foods, it may be worthwhile to try strategies such as avoiding highly palatable foods in favor of bland, dilute, or even slightly aversive foods, and perhaps recommending multiple small meals of equivalent daily calories, in order to avoid overstimulation and early satiety. Finally, pharmacological modulation of insular reactivity might increase sensitivity to food in patients with anorexia nervosa or attenuate hyperresponsivity in those with bulimia nervosa. For example, recent studies in healthy subjects (44) show that olanzapine enhances reward response to food in brain reward circuitry and decreases inhibition to food consumption in regions thought to inhibit feeding behavior. In summary, an understanding of the basic pathophysiology of anorexia and bulimia nervosa provides rationales and heuristics to develop improved treatments for these chronic and deadly disorders.

From the Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, Calif.; Department of Psychiatry, University of Colorado at Denver and Health Sciences Center, Aurora; San Diego Veterans Affairs Health Care System, San Diego; and Departments of Psychiatry and Neurobiology and Anatomy, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, N.Y.
Address correspondence to Dr. Kaye ().

Supported by NIMH grants MH46001, MH42984, and K05-MD01894; by NIMH training grant T32-MH18399; and by the Price Foundation.

Dr. Frank has received support from NIMH and the Klarman Family Foundation Grants Program in Eating Disorders. Dr. Kaye has received support from NIMH and the Price Foundation. The other authors report no financial relationships with commercial interests.

Supplementary Material


1 Kaye WH, Fudge JL, Paulus M: New insights into symptoms and neurocircuit function of anorexia nervosa. Nat Rev Neurosci 2009; 10:573–584Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

2 Kaye W: Neurobiology of anorexia and bulimia nervosa. Physiol Behav 2008; 94:121–135Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

3 Berthoud HR: Homeostatic and non-homeostatic pathways involved in the control of food intake and energy balance. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2006; 14(suppl 5):197S–200SCrossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

4 Volkow ND, Wang GJ, Baler RD: Reward, dopamine, and the control of food intake: implications for obesity. Trends Cogn Sci 2011; 15:37–46Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

5 Rolls ET: Sensory processing in the brain related to the control of food intake. Proc Nutr Soc 2007; 66:96–112Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

6 Small DM: Central gustatory processing in humans. Adv Otorhinolaryngol 2006; 63:191–220MedlineGoogle Scholar

7 Couturier J, Lock J: What is recovery in adolescent anorexia nervosa? Int J Eat Disord 2006; 39:550–555Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

8 Wagner A, Barbarich-Marsteller NC, Frank GK, Bailer UF, Wonderlich SA, Crosby RD, Henry SE, Vogel V, Plotnicov K, McConaha C, Kaye WH: Personality traits after recovery from eating disorders: do subtypes differ? Int J Eat Disord 2006; 39:276–284Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

9 Wagner A, Aizenstein H, Mazurkewicz L, Fudge J, Frank GK, Putnam K, Bailer UF, Fischer L, Kaye WH: Altered insula response to taste stimuli in individuals recovered from restricting-type anorexia nervosa. Neuropsychopharmacology 2008; 33:513–523Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

10 Silver IA, Erecińska M: Glucose-induced intracellular ion changes in sugar-sensitive hypothalamic neurons. J Neurophysiol 1998; 79:1733–1745Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

11 Chandrashekar J, Hoon MA, Ryba NJ, Zuker CS: The receptors and cells for mammalian taste. Nature 2006; 444:288–294Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

12 Knight I: The development and applications of sucralose, a new high-intensity sweetener. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 1994; 72:435–439Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

13 First MB, Gibbon M, Spitzer RL, Williams JBW: User’s Guide for the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders–Research Version (SCID-I). New York, Biometrics Research Department, New York State Psychiatric Institute, 1996Google Scholar

14 Beck AT, Ward CH, Mendelson M, Mock J, Erbaugh J: An inventory for measuring depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1961; 4:561–571Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

15 Cloninger CR, Przybeck TR, Svrakic DM, Wetzel RD: The Temperament and Character Inventory (TCI): A Guide to Its Development and Use. St Louis, Mo, Center for Psychobiology of Personality, Washington University, 1994, pp 19–28Google Scholar

16 Spielberger CD: Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Palo Alto, Calif, Consulting Psychologists Press, 1983Google Scholar

17 Small DM: Individual differences in the neurophysiology of reward and the obesity epidemic. Int J Obes (Lond) 2009; 33(suppl 2):S44–S48Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

18 Vocks S, Herpertz S, Rosenberger C, Senf W, Gizewski ER: Effects of gustatory stimulation on brain activity during hunger and satiety in females with restricting-type anorexia nervosa: an fMRI study. J Psychiatr Res 2011; 45:395–403Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

19 Kurth FZ, Zilles K, Fox PT, Laird AR, Eickhoff SB: A link between the systems: functional differentiation and integration within the human insula revealed by meta-analysis. Brain Struct Funct 2010; 214:519–534Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

20 Craig AD: How do you feel—now? The anterior insula and human awareness. Nat Rev Neurosci 2009; 10:59–70Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

21 Sunday SR, Halmi KA: Taste perceptions and hedonics in eating disorders. Physiol Behav 1990; 48:587–594Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

22 Paulus MP, Stein MB: An insular view of anxiety. Biol Psychiatry 2006; 60:383–387Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

23 Craig AD: The sentient self. Brain Struct Funct 2010; 214:563–577Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

24 Haase L, Cerf-Ducastel B, Murphy C: Cortical activation in response to pure taste stimuli during the physiological states of hunger and satiety. Neuroimage 2009; 44:1008–1021Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

25 Radeloff D, Willmann K, Otto L, Lindner M, Putnam K, Leeuwen SV, Kaye WH, Poustka F, Wagner A: High-fat taste challenge reveals altered striatal response in women recovered from bulimia nervosa: a pilot study. World J Biol Psychiatry (Epub ahead of print, April 30, 2012)MedlineGoogle Scholar

26 Chikama M, McFarland NR, Amaral DG, Haber SN: Insular cortical projections to functional regions of the striatum correlate with cortical cytoarchitectonic organization in the primate. J Neurosci 1997; 17:9686–9705Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

27 Fudge JL, Breitbart MA, Danish M, Pannoni V: Insular and gustatory inputs to the caudal ventral striatum in primates. J Comp Neurol 2005; 490:101–118Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

28 Berridge KC, Ho CY, Richard JM, DiFeliceantonio AG: The tempted brain eats: pleasure and desire circuits in obesity and eating disorders. Brain Res 2010; 1350:43–64Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

29 Frank GK, Oberndorfer TA, Simmons AN, Paulus MP, Fudge JL, Yang TT, Kaye WH: Sucrose activates human taste pathways differently from artificial sweetener. Neuroimage 2008; 39:1559–1569Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

30 Zink CF, Weinberger DR: Cracking the moody brain: the rewards of self starvation. Nat Med 2010; 16:1382–1383Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

31 Cowdrey FA, Park RJ, Harmer CJ, McCabe C: Increased neural processing of rewarding and aversive food stimuli in recovered anorexia nervosa. Biol Psychiatry 2011; 70:736–743Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

32 Frank GK, Reynolds JR, Shott ME, Jappe L, Yang TT, Tregellas JR, O’Reilly RC: Anorexia nervosa and obesity are associated with opposite brain reward response. Neuropsychopharmacology 2012; 37:2031–2046Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

33 Bohon C, Stice E: Reward abnormalities among women with full and subthreshold bulimia nervosa: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Int J Eat Disord 2011; 44:585–595Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

34 Frank GK, Reynolds JR, Shott ME, O’Reilly RC: Altered temporal difference learning in bulimia nervosa. Biol Psychiatry 2011; 70:728–735Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

35 Stice E, Spoor S, Bohon C, Small DM: Relation between obesity and blunted striatal response to food is moderated by TaqIA A1 allele. Science 2008; 322:449–452Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

36 Brooks SJ, O’Daly OG, Uher R, Friederich HC, Giampietro V, Brammer M, Williams SC, Schiöth HB, Treasure J, Campbell IC: Differential neural responses to food images in women with bulimia versus anorexia nervosa. PLoS ONE 2011; 6:e22259Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

37 Giel KE, Friederich HC, Teufel M, Hautzinger M, Enck P, Zipfel S: Attentional processing of food pictures in individuals with anorexia nervosa: an eye-tracking study. Biol Psychiatry 2011; 69:661–667Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

38 Nie Y, Vigues S, Hobbs JR, Conn GL, Munger SD: Distinct contributions of T1R2 and T1R3 taste receptor subunits to the detection of sweet stimuli. Curr Biol 2005; 15:1948–1952Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

39 Lambe EK, Katzman DK, Mikulis DJ, Kennedy SH, Zipursky RB: Cerebral gray matter volume deficits after weight recovery from anorexia nervosa. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1997; 54:537–542Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

40 Caria A, Veit R, Sitaram R, Lotze M, Weiskopf N, Grodd W, Birbaumer N: Regulation of anterior insular cortex activity using real-time fMRI. Neuroimage 2007; 35:1238–1246Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

41 Domschke K, Stevens S, Pfleiderer B, Gerlach AL: Interoceptive sensitivity in anxiety and anxiety disorders: an overview and integration of neurobiological findings. Clin Psychol Rev 2010; 30:1–11Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

42 Farb NA, Segal ZV, Anderson AK: Mindfulness meditation training alters cortical representations of interoceptive attention. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 2013; 8:15–26Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

43 Lutz A, McFarlin DR, Perlman DM, Salomons T, Davidson RJ: Altered anterior insula activation during anticipation and experience of painful stimuli in expert meditators. Neuroimage 2013; 64:538–546Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

44 Mathews J, Newcomer JW, Mathews JR, Fales CL, Pierce KJ, Akers BK, Marcu I, Barch DM: Neural correlates of weight gain with olanzapine. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2012; 69:1226–1237Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar