The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×
Letter to the EditorFull Access

Classifying Depression

To the Editor: Dr. Parker reported that bipolar depression is melancholic. Bipolar I and II may be distinct disorders (1, 2). The prevalence of melancholic features may be low in bipolar II outpatients with depression (3), a common (30%–50% of depressed outpatients) and often atypical depression (4, 5). Bipolar II depression in outpatients may be different from the bipolar I depression, primarily in inpatients, studied by Dr. Parker.

Sixty-four consecutive outpatients with unipolar disorders (major depressive disorder or dysthymic disorder) and 97 consecutive outpatients with bipolar II disorder who were seen for treatment of a major depressive episode in a private practice were interviewed at intake with the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders—Clinician Version (6). Because the modal duration of hypomania is 1–3 days (7), the 4-day minimum duration of hypomania found in DSM-IV was not a criterion. “At least some days” of hypomania were required in the bipolar outpatients (5). Most bipolar II subjects had experienced 2–3 days of hypomania, and all had had more than one episode of hypomania. Family members or close friends supplemented clinical information. After complete description of study to the subjects, written informed consent was obtained.

Melancholic features were present in 20 of the bipolar II subjects (20.6%) and in 16 of the unipolar subjects (25.0%) (χ2=0.42, df=1, p=0.51, two-tailed). Atypical features were present in 44 of the bipolar II subjects (45.4%) and in 11 of the unipolar subjects (17.2%) (χ2=13.60, df=1, p=0.0002, two-tailed). These findings are in line with those from previous reports (4, 710). Outpatient bipolar II depression seems more atypical, not more melancholic, than unipolar depression. Bipolar I and II depressions may have different clinical pictures in different settings.

References

1. Benazzi F: A comparison of the age of onset of bipolar I and bipolar II outpatients. J Affect Disord 1999; 54:249-253Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

2. Coryell W: Bipolar II disorder: the importance of hypomania, in Bipolar Disorders: Clinical Course and Outcome. Edited by Goldberg JF, Harrow M. Washington, DC, American Psychiatric Press, 1999, pp 219-236Google Scholar

3. Benazzi F: Bipolar II depression with melancholic features. Ann Clin Psychiatry 2000; 12:29-33Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

4. Benazzi F: Prevalence and clinical features of atypical depression in depressed outpatients: a 467-case study. Psychiatry Res 1999; 86:259-265Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

5. Akiskal HS: Mood disorders: clinical features, in Kaplan & Sadock’s Comprehensive Textbook of Psychiatry, 7th ed. Edited by Sadock BJ, Sadock VA. Philadelphia, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2000, pp 1338-1377Google Scholar

6. First MB, Spitzer RL, Gibbon M, Williams JBW: Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders—Clinician Version (SCID-CV). Washington, DC, American Psychiatric Press, 1997Google Scholar

7. Akiskal HS: The prevalent clinical spectrum of bipolar disorders: beyond DSM-IV. J Clin Psychopharmacol 1996; 16(suppl 1):4S-14SGoogle Scholar

8. Himmelhoch JM: The paradox of anxiety syndromes comorbid with the bipolar illnesses, in Bipolar Disorders: Clinical Course and Outcome. Edited by Goldberg JF, Harrow M. Washington, DC, American Psychiatric Press, 1999, pp 237-258Google Scholar

9. Perugi G, Akiskal HS, Lattanzi L, Cecconi D, Mastrocinque C, Patronelli A, Vignoli S, Bemi E: The high prevalence of “soft” bipolar (II) features in atypical depression. Compr Psychiatry 1998; 39:63-71Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

10. Baldessarini R: A plea for integrity of the bipolar disorder concept. Bipolar Disord 2000; 2:3-7Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar