The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×
Published Online:

To the Editor: We appreciate Dr. Garside and colleagues’ letter regarding our report of MRI lesions in a family with bipolar disorder. The authors are correct in noting that white matter lesions are common in the elderly. Our study found no age effect when comparing family members with MRI lesions to those without.

While we did not have an active comparison group in this study, our research group did a previous study of comparison subjects (1), using the same spin-echo pulse sequences, the same classification system for reporting the data, and the same raters who were blind to information about the study subjects. These data were reported in the introduction and indicate a low incidence of MRI lesions (1%) in subjects under age 45 and a higher incidence of lesions in the elderly.

The purpose of this study was not to look for correlations between the clinical manifestations of bipolar disorder and MRI lesions. Other researchers have already documented such findings (25). Rather, we were specifically looking at the prevalence of MRI lesions in affected and unaffected family members in a family with a substantial history of bipolar disorder. As noted in the article, the prevalence of white matter and subcortical lesions was high in unaffected family members and those with bipolar disorder. In the absence of other diseases that could explain these findings (the family had few risk factors), we postulate that they may correlate with a genotypic risk factor for the disorder.

References

1. Krishnan KR, McDonald WM, Escalona PR, Doraiswamy PM, Na C, Husain MM, Figiel GS, Boyko OB, Ellinwood EH, Nemeroff CB: Magnetic resonance imaging of the caudate nuclei in depression: preliminary observations. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1992; 49:553–557Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

2. Dupont RM, Jernigan TL, Butters N: Subcortical abnormalities detected in bipolar affective disorder using magnetic resonance imaging. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1990; 47:55–59Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

3. Swayze VW, Andreasen NC, Alliger RJ, Ehrhardt JC, Yuh WTC: Structural brain abnormalities in bipolar affective disorder: ventricular enlargement and focal signal hyperintensities. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1990; 47:1054–1059Google Scholar

4. Figiel GS, Krishnan KR, Rao VP, Doraiswamy M, Ellinwood EH Jr, Nemeroff CB, Evans D, Boyko O: Subcortical hyperintensities on brain magnetic resonance imaging: a comparison of normal and bipolar subjects. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 1991; 3:18–22Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

5. Strakowski SM, Woods BT, Tohen M, Wilson DR, Douglass AW, Stoll AL: MRI subcortical hyperintensities in mania at first hospitalization. Biol Psychiatry 1993; 33:204–206Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar