The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×
Letter to the EditorFull Access

Dr. Chochinov and Colleagues Reply

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.155.7.994a

TO THE EDITOR: Drs. Swanwick and Wrigley raise a number of important points to which we are pleased to respond. While standard systems such as the Research Diagnostic Criteria may or may not be ideal for elderly depressed patients, an alternative “gold standard” for this population has yet to achieve common acceptance. Alternative criteria have been proposed for elderly patients who are physically ill (1), but they largely identify the same depressed patients as standard criteria (2, 3). Hence, we doubt that their application in this particular study would have made much difference. We would, however, encourage additional research to develop and validate appropriate techniques to identify depression in this patient population.

Depressed elderly patients may indeed be less likely than younger patients to complain of low mood. We, in fact, recommended a two-item screening approach (assessing loss of interest as well as depressed mood), since it provides complete coverage of the core criterion symptoms of depression. The same logic is incorporated into most structured interviews, which allow skipping the remaining symptoms if depressed mood and loss of interest are both absent. In our study, however, addition of the loss-of-interest item did not actually improve diagnostic accuracy over the single-item approach. The accuracy of single-item screening in identifying depressive disorders in older adults has also been reported by other investigators (4).

Finally, our results are unarguably criterion specific. It is worth noting that even with standard criteria, depression among the terminally ill tends to be underdiagnosed (5). This may reflect, in part, clinician discomfort in probing too deeply into the psychological experiences of dying patients (6). To suggest that single-item screening diminishes psychiatry's important role in addressing these issues is simply reading too much into our results. We hope our study serves as a gentle reminder to clinicians to ask their dying patients—even in a simple way—about their mood states. Doing so may help increase recognition of depression in this vulnerable population.

References

1 Endicott J: Measurement of depression in patients with cancer. Cancer 1984; 53:2243–2248Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

2 Kathol RG, Noyes R Jr, Williams J, Mutgi A, Carroll B, Perry P: Diagnosing depression in patients with medical illness. Psychosomatics 1990; 31:434–440Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

3 Chochinov HM, Wilson KG, Enns M, Lander S: Prevalence of depression in the terminally ill: effects of diagnostic criteria and symptom threshold judgments. Am J Psychiatry 1994; 151:537–540LinkGoogle Scholar

4 Mahoney J, Drinka TJK, Abler R, Gunter-Hunter G, Matthews C, Gravenstein S, Carnes M: Screening for depression: single question versus GDS. J Am Geriatr Soc 1994; 42:1103–1109Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

5 Goldberg RJ, Mor V: A survey of psychotropic drug use in terminal cancer patients. Psychosomatics 1985; 26:745–751Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

6 Maguire P: Barriers to psychological care of the dying. BMJ 1985; 291:1711–1713Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar