The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×
Full Access

Social support: a genetic-epidemiologic analysis

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.154.10.1398

OBJECTIVE: Social support is a widely used construct in the fields of mental health, sociology, and medicine and has typically been conceptualized as an environmental factor that influences the risk for dysfunction and disease. In this study a longitudinal twin design was used to clarify the etiology of social support. METHOD: A 16-item social support inventory was administered at personal interview to a population-based sample of female twins twice, approximately 5 years apart. A twin measurement model-which permits an estimation of the etiologic role of genetic and environmental factors correcting for errors of measurement or short-term temporal fluctuations-was applied to these data. RESULTS: Six factors, which were moderately stable over time, were found: relative problems, friend problems, relative support, confidants, friend support, and social integration. The best-fitting twin measurement models indicated that genetic factors were of substantial etiologic significance for all six social support scales. Heritabilities of the stable component of social support ranged from 43% to 75%. Familial-environmental factors contributed to twin resemblance only for relative problems and relative support. No evidence was found for significant biases in the twin method. CONCLUSIONS: Measures of social support are moderately stable over time. When short-term fluctuations are corrected for, heritable factors are of substantial etiologic importance for social support as measured at personal interview. Treating social support solely as an environmental measure is probably incorrect. Through genetically influenced traits such as temperament, individuals play a substantial role in creating their own social environments.