The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×
Site maintenance Monday, July 8th, 2024. Please note that access to some content and account information will be unavailable on this date.
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.111.4.283

Criminal suspects, while under the influence of barbiturate drugs, may deliberately withhold information, persist in giving untruthful answers, or falsely confess to crimes they have not committed. Narcoanalysis is of doubtful value when used for the purpose of obtaining confessions to crimes. For ethical reasons the psychiatrist is advised against performing narcoanalysis when the examination is requested as an aid to criminal investigation.

Narcoanalysis is sometimes of value in the psychiatric examination of criminal suspects who have entered a plea of insanity. Information so obtained should not be used as evidence in determining the innocence or guilt of the accused person, unless it is with his consent and his attorney's approval. Indications and contraindications for narcoanalysis are described, as well as some criteria for evaluating the reliability of the individual examination.

Access content

To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.