The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×
Site maintenance Monday, July 8th, 2024. Please note that access to some content and account information will be unavailable on this date.
ArticleNo Access

THE INHIBITION OF BEHAVIOR: WORKING CONCEPTS

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.107.9.701

1. The minute-to-minute effectiveness of the individual is maintained in part by mechanisms that inhibit potentially disruptive behavior.

2. The term inhibition has been used as being much broader than suppression and repression, and as showing interrelationships not recognized when these latter terms are used-e.g., with such diverse matters as concentration and dissociation, the resumption of interrupted tasks, depressive reactions and manic states.

3. The inhibition of potentially disruptive behavior is described in terms of an interplay between four main forces :—

(a) The transitory inhibition exerted by the ongoing activity of the moment.

(b) The intensification of inhibition through integration with stronger motivations.

(c) The persistent inhibition exerted by basic concepts laid down by intense personal experience or by cultural indoctrination.

(d) The inherent tendency of the individual to normalize his behavior; in this instance, to desensitize and integrate inhibited, intensified action tendencies by obtaining expression for them in reality, in fantasy, and in dreaming. This constitutes a denial of the assertion that the principle of wish fulfillment is of universal validity in explaining dream formation. Normalization is posited as a factor of major importance in psychodynamics.

4. Stress has been laid on the fact that basic concepts exert their inhibitory powers in virtue of their degree of intensification, and not in virtue of their content. This has immense significance in understanding some of the origins of deviant behavior in terms of the divergence between intensely held cultural beliefs and the actualities of human activity. It has no less significance in illuminating the fact that beliefs and designs for behavior held to be noxious in one society may in another show no evidence of producing personality damage.

Access content

To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.