The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×
Letter to the EditorFull Access

Olanzapine Augmentation for Trichotillomania

To the Editor: Trichotillomania has historically been difficult to treat pharmacologically (1, 2). Antipsychotic augmentation has been proposed to assist in managing symptoms in this difficult-to-treat population (3, 4). We know of one report of olanzapine augmentation of fluoxetine in the treatment of trichotillomania (5). I report on four patients who were consecutively treated with olanzapine augmentation of citalopram for refractory trichotillomania.

Ms. A was a 47-year-old Caucasian woman with a psychiatric history significant for trichotillomania, dysthymia, and past alcohol abuse whose trichotillomania had failed to respond to treatment with fluoxetine, 60 mg/day, and citalopram, 60 mg/day. She found that olanzapine, 7.5 mg b.i.d., in addition to citalopram helped reduce her hair pulling dramatically, over citalopram alone, to a point at which she was finally able to have her first haircut in over 10 years. She has had a good response to this treatment for almost a year.

Ms. B was a 33-year-old Caucasian woman with a psychiatric history significant for major depression, obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), and 19 years of trichotillomania whose hair pulling failed to respond to treatment with paroxetine, 60 mg/day; she obtained partial response when taking citalopram, 80 mg/day. She described ongoing and continual dramatic improvement when taking 5 mg/day of olanzapine to augment treatment with citalopram. She was still seeing benefit from this therapy after 6 months.

Ms. C was a 45-year-old Caucasian woman with a psychiatric history that was significant for bipolar II disorder, alcohol dependence (in remission), and trichotillomania whose mood disorder had responded to treatment with carbamazepine but whose trichotillomania had failed to respond to a regimen of 40 mg b.i.d. of fluoxetine, 50 mg of fluvoxamine at 6 p.m. and 150 mg at bedtime, 40 mg/day of paroxetine, 100 mg b.i.d. of sertraline, and 80 mg of citalopram at bedtime. Olanzapine augmentation, 1.25 mg/day, provided an enhanced mood benefit but had no impact on Ms. C’s trichotillomania. She could not tolerate higher doses of olanzapine.

Ms. D was a 49-year-old Caucasian woman with a psychiatric history significant for dysthymia, OCD, and trichotillomania who had medication intolerance or insufficient response to the trichotillomania portion of her illness when taking 75 mg b.i.d. of venlafaxine, 50 mg/day of paroxetine, 50 mg b.i.d. of sertraline, 40 mg b.i.d. of fluoxetine, 100 mg b.i.d. of fluvoxamine, and 60 mg/day of citalopram; clonazepam was prescribed at a dose of 0.5 mg every 6 hours on an as-needed basis. Ms. D claimed profound enhanced control of her hair pulling with olanzapine augmentation at a dose of 2.5 mg at bedtime along with citalopram, 50 mg at bedtime. She stated that this was the greatest control she had felt “in 10 years.”

These consecutively treated patients described enhanced clinical benefit from olanzapine augmentation of citalopram; three of four patients had a clear improvement in their trichotillomania symptoms. They described enduring benefit over several months, which suggests that it was not a placebo effect, although a definitive placebo-controlled trial would be necessary to reach this conclusion with certainty. None of these patients has lost the benefit of the drug as of yet. The limitations of this report include its small group size and the lack of a standardized assessment tool to evaluate response, along with a possible sampling bias. Nevertheless, these patients’ self-reports described clear clinical benefit from this strategy, even though their mood symptoms were essentially stable before we began these trials. Further studies would help delineate the degree of response, optimal dose, and recommendations for duration of treatment.

References

1. Christenson GA, Mackenzie TB, Mitchell JE, Callies AL: A placebo-controlled, double-blind crossover study of fluoxetine in trichotillomania. Am J Psychiatry 1991; 148:1566-1571LinkGoogle Scholar

2. Keuthen NJ, Fraim C, Deckersbach T, Dougherty DD, Baer L, Jenike MA: Longitudinal follow-up of naturalistic treatment outcome in patients with trichotillomania. J Clin Psychiatry 2001; 62:101-107Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

3. Stein DJ, Hollander E: Low-dose pimozide augmentation of serotonin reuptake blockers in the treatment of trichotillomania. J Clin Psychiatry 1992; 53:123-126MedlineGoogle Scholar

4. Potenza MN, McDougle CJ: Potential of atypical antipsychotics in the treatment of non-psychotic disorders. CNS Drugs 1998; 9:213-232CrossrefGoogle Scholar

5. Potenza MN, Wasylink S, Epperson CN, McDougle CJ: Olanzapine augmentation of fluoxetine in the treatment of trichotillomania (letter). Am J Psychiatry 1998; 155:1299-1300LinkGoogle Scholar