The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×
Letter to the EditorFull Access

Paranoid Schizophrenia—Malingering or Factitious Disorder?

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.156.3.498a

To the Editor: The recent clinical case conference by Katherine J. Michels, M.D., and Robert Michels, M.D. (1), described an enigmatic and fascinating patient. They carefully describe the initial presentation and the subsequent prolonged psychiatric hospitalization of this difficult patient. The authors also discuss the dilemmas faced by the treatment team because of the patient’s refusal to divulge information about himself. Nonetheless, several important issues remain unclear. They do not provide much information about the patient’s medical history. The patient apparently reported a history of three deep-vein thromboses for which he took warfarin. The patient evidently took an overdose of this anti­coagulant, as well as acetaminophen with codeine, that resulted in elevated coagulation times, hematuria, and guaiac-positive stools. Did the psychiatry team believe this patient had a coagulation disorder? Was warfarin prescribed during his prolonged psychiatric hospitalization?

His medical history is of particular interest because of the distinct possibility that this patient had a factitious disorder with psychologic and possibly physical symptoms. This mysterious patient’s apparent goal was to gain hospital admission and then extend his hospitalization by withholding important information. The patient’s decision to travel to New York to become anonymous is somewhat suggestive of peregrination. Without the patient’s cooperation, the treatment team clearly could not determine where and when he had previously sought medical care. I propose that the authors add the diagnosis of factitious disorder to their psychiatric differential diagnosis in this challenging case.

References

1. Michels KJ, Michels RM: Clinical case: unknown (clinical case conference). Am J Psychiatry 1997; 154:1599–1601AbstractGoogle Scholar