The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×
Letter to the EditorFull Access

Suicidal Threats and Therapists’ Helplessness

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.156.11.1843

To the Editor: Thomas G. Gutheil, M.D., and Diane Schetky, M.D. (1), provide useful suggestions for the clinical management of time-based and contingent suicidal intentions. The authors recommend that therapists share their feelings of helplessness with patients: “shared helplessness may provide a pathway to empathic connection” (p. 1506). It may reinforce, however, the patients’ sense of control over therapists. For some patients, a time-based and contingent suicidal threat may represent an attempt to dominate therapists. Making therapists feel helpless may allow patients to not only disown this feeling in themselves but to also feel power over the therapists. This defense may be considered equivalent to a mechanism of projective identification. The interpretation of this defense may lead patients to acknowledge their own helplessness, to stop fearing retaliation from therapists, and to better benefit from support.

The authors report that, for some patients, death takes on “the qualities of an object relationship that, paradoxically, permits continued living” (p. 1503). In a similar vein, we have found that the exploration of the meanings of death and suicide in these cases suggests the role of splitting, through which suicide is fantasized about as both a means of getting rid of the bad parts of the self and the object and being reunited with the good object (2). The interpretation of the splitting defense may, without challenging directly this protective relationship, gradually lead to an alleviation of suicidal drive.

References

1. Gutheil TG, Schetky D: A date with death: management of time-based and contingent suicidal intent. Am J Psychiatry 1998; 155:1502–1507Google Scholar

2. Chabrol H, Sztulman H: Splitting and the psychodynamics of adolescent and young adult suicide attempts. Int J Psychoanal 1997; 78:1199–1208Google Scholar