The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.155.11.1584

Abstract

Objective:It is likely that the corpus striatum is involved in obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Prior studies have inconsistently found alterations in caudate volumes in patients with OCD. This study was undertaken in the hope that N-acetylaspartate and volumetric measures together would elucidate the presence and nature of corpus striatum volumetric abnormalities in OCD. Method:Thirteen patients meeting the DSM-IV criteria for OCD, who had been medication free for a minimum of 6 weeks, and 13 psychiatrically normal matched comparison subjects participated in the study. Short echo 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H-MRS) was used to measure levels of N-acetylaspartate and several other cerebral metabolites from a 4.5-cm3 volume in the left corpus striatum of all 26 subjects. Metabolite levels were estimated by fitting the time domain spectroscopy data with a noninteractive computer program. Volumes of the left and right head of the caudate nucleus in each subject were determined by semiautomatic segmentation of the volumetric images.Results:N-Acetylaspartate levels from the left corpus striatum were significantly lower in the patients with OCD than in the comparison subjects. There were no differences in either left or right caudate volume between the two groups. Conclusions:Despite the lack of differences in caudate volumes between the OCD patients and the comparison subjects, the lower level of N-acetylaspartate in the left corpus striatum of the patients suggests reduced neuronal density in this region. Inconsistent volumetric findings among prior studies may reflect a poorer sensitivity of magnetic resonance imaging morphometry for detecting neuronal loss compared with 1H-MRS measurement of N-acetylaspartate. Am J Psychiatry 1998; 155: 1584-1591

Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is a prevalent, serious neuropsychiatric disorder (1) of unknown etiology. Several lines of investigation into the cause(s) of OCD have suggested that it is characterized by dysfunction within a basal ganglia-thalamocortical neuronal circuit (2, 3). In particular, the corpus striatum has shown abnormalities in patients with OCD compared with normal subjects in several imaging studies (4–6). Positron emission tomography (PET) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies during symptom provocation have revealed activation within the corpus striatum (specifically in the caudate) along with other brain regions (medial orbitofrontal cortex, anterior cingulate, amygdala) (7–8). Studies of OCD patients following treatment with either pharmacotherapy or behavioral therapy indicate that functional abnormalities in the corpus striatum normalize as a correlate of symptom reduction (5, 6). Additional support for the involvement of the basal ganglia-thalamocortical neuronal circuit in OCD comes from the finding of neurosensory “gating” abnormalities in patients with OCD. These gating deficits are consistent with dysfunction within this neuronal circuit (9, 10).

Several investigators have attempted to delineate a neuroanatomic abnormality in OCD by measuring the size or assessing the structural integrity of presumably critical CNS structures. In particular, the corpus striatum has been the focus of a series of computerized tomographic (CT) and, more recently, structural MRI studies (11–16). These studies have been remarkably inconsistent, with some finding reduced caudate size (13, 16), another finding increased caudate size (12), and some finding no differences (14, 15).

Short echo proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H-MRS) can be used to obtain information about several metabolites that are highly relevant to our understanding of the mechanisms of dysfunction within neuronal circuits in OCD and other neuropsychiatric disorders (17, 18). N-Acetylaspartate (NAA), which is readily measured with the use of 1H-MRS, has become a well-accepted neuronal marker (17–20). In fact, it is believed that N-acetylaspartate may decline in neuronal tissue before neuronal loss is detectable by conventional MRI morphometric methods (21, 22). Glutamate and glutamine, which are also reliably measured with the use of short echo 1H-MRS, are involved in the cycle of excitatory neurotransmission (17, 18) and thus may yield additional information regarding OCD.

In this study of patients with OCD and matched comparison subjects, 1H-MRS and volumetric MRI were used to further delineate a role for corpus striatum dysfunction in the pathophysiology of OCD. Maintenance of a tolerable total study time for these subjects (1.5–2 hours) precluded the acquisition of data from both the left and right striatum. We elected to focus on the left side, because previous studies had shown bilateral abnormalities and because we could then compare data from the left side acquired in a group of never-treated schizophrenic patients. On the basis of previous reports of volumetric and functional anomalies in the left corpus striatum, we hypothesized that OCD patients and comparison subjects would show different N-acetylaspartate levels in this region. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to combine short echo 1H-MRS and volumetric imaging of the caudate in OCD. Caudate volumes were measured in these same subjects in the hope that the simultaneous examination of these volumes and N-acetylaspartate levels might shed light on the inconsistent volumetric findings that have emerged from prior studies.

METHOD

Thirteen patients diagnosed with OCD according to the DSM-IV criteria and 13 healthy comparison subjects were studied. The OCD patients were recruited from among persons seeking treatment at either the Department of Psychiatry, St. Boniface General Hospital, Winnipeg, Canada (N=10), or the Department of Psychiatry, London Health Sciences Centre, London, Canada (N=3). Comparison subjects were chosen from a pool of subjects recruited from the London area by advertisement. Subjects were chosen in such a way as to minimize demographic differences (gender, age, education, parental education, and handedness) between the patient and comparison groups (table 1).

Subjects with OCD were diagnosed by an experienced clinician-researcher (M.B.S.) using a semistructured interview (the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders, Patient Edition [SCID-P] [23]). Comorbidity, family history, and other illness parameters (e.g., age at onset) were assessed at this time as part of the clinical interview, as was the patient’s medical and prior treatment history. The same experienced interviewer (M.B.S.) determined the severity of OCD symptoms using the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (24, 25), the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scale (26), and the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (27). One patient had clinical depression at the time of the study. All OCD subjects were outpatients and had no other current comorbidity including tics.

The subjects with OCD and the healthy comparison subjects were required to have been medication free for a minimum of 6 weeks before the day of scanning (nine patients had never received antidepressant medication), to be otherwise in good physical health, and to have no history of significant head injury or seizures. One subject had a history of neuroleptic exposure 2 years before this study. None of the OCD subjects was participating in formal behavioral or cognitive therapy during the time of the study, nor were they involved in any form of self-help cognitive or behavioral therapy for their condition. As part of the magnetic resonance study, routine clinical images were collected for each subject and viewed by a radiologist (T.J.C.), who detected no gross abnormalities on any scans. In addition to the aforementioned criteria, the healthy comparison subjects underwent a routine clinical interview and were screened with the SCID-P by another experienced clinician-researcher (P.C.W.) to ensure that they did not meet criteria for any axis I or axis II psychiatric disorders.

The education level of each subject was rated on a 4-point scale (1=grade 10 or lower; 2=grades 11–13; 3=1–3 years of college or university; 4=4 or more years of college or university). Parental education ratings were also evaluated as above for the most highly educated parent. The handedness of each subject was defined by a handedness questionnaire (28). The height and weight of each subject were also recorded so that these characteristics could be used as covariates in the statistical analysis of the volumetric data.

After complete description of the study to each subject, written informed consent was obtained. The study was approved by the Faculty of Medicine Human Subjects Committee of the University of Manitoba and the Review Board for Health Sciences Research Involving Human Subjects of the University of Western Ontario.

1H-MRS

Spectroscopy data were acquired as described in detail elsewhere (29). Spectra were acquired from a 15×20×15-mm3 volume of interest in the left corpus striatum (figure 1). Although the images used to position the volume of interest were not transformed to Talairach space (30), the volume of interest studied was approximately positioned within the volume defined by the following Talairach coordinates: x=0 to –15, y=–10 to 20, and z=0 to 15. Both water suppressed (31) and water unsuppressed spectra were acquired with the use of a stimulated echo acquisition mode (32) sequence (TR=1500 msec, TE=20 msec, mixing time=30 msec, 4096 complex points, 250 µsec dwell time, 550 and 30 data acquisitions, respectively).

Spectral Processing

Spectral processing is also described in detail elsewhere (29, 33). Each spectrum was fitted to a complete spectrum model composed of 12 metabolites (19, 24, 3436) and three macromolecules (37) with resonances between 1.9 ppm and 3.5 ppm (NAACH3 was referenced to 2.01 ppm). The footnote to figure 2 contains a complete list of the metabolites and macromolecules included in the spectrum model.

Metabolite levels were normalized to the unsuppressed water signal following correction for the partial volume effect (29, 35) of the ratio of CSF, gray matter, and white matter (estimated as 1%/60%/39%). Therefore, metabolite levels represent the average metabolite level (and standard deviation) in the volume studied, uncorrected for the nuclear magnetic resonance relaxation parameters T1 and T2 (since accurate values were unavailable for each metabolite).

Volumetric Imaging

The entire brain of each subject was imaged on the same magnetic resonance scanner and on the same day that the 1H-MRS data were acquired. Volumetric images consisted of 128 contiguous 1.56-mm-thick coronal slices (0.94×0.94-mm in-plane resolution) acquired with the use of a three-dimensional fast low-angle shot (38) sequence (TR=30 msec, TE=10 msec). To measure consistent volumes of the head of the caudate nucleus, ANALYZE software (39) was used to reformat the coronal slices into slices perpendicular to a plane joining the most inferior margin of the splenium with the most inferior margin of the genu of the corpus callosum. The head of the caudate nucleus, bordered by a plane parallel to the anterior portion of the pons (13), a plane parallel to the anterior commissure, the frontal horn of the lateral ventricle, and the anterior limb of the internal capsule (14), was segmented by means of a semiautomated histogram technique in Xstatpack (a multipurpose image quantification utility for use by medical imagers, J. Davis, 1990–1998; for more information, contact the third author). The volumes of 10 subjects were calculated twice on the same scan to determine test-retest reliability. All volume measurements were performed by the same rater (M.D.) without knowledge of diagnosis or MRS measures.

Statistical Analysis

All statistical tests were performed with SPSS release 6.0 (40). The age, education level, parental education level, height, and weight of the subjects were comparable in the two groups (t<0.5, df=24, p>0.50, two-tailed test). The use of these variables as covariates therefore allowed for the reduction of extraneous variance in error terms without risking removal of genuine group effects (41, 42).

Although 12 metabolites and three macromolecules were modeled for each spectrum, only metabolites quantified with a coefficient of variation less than 75% were considered reliable and were included in between-group comparisons. Since N-acetylaspartate was the focus of hypothesized differences, values of this metabolite were submitted to analysis of covariance (ANCOVA); the remaining measures were analyzed by multivariate analysis of covariance (MAN­­COVA). Age, education, and parental education were used as covariates in these tests. A p value of ≤0.05 (two-tailed) was considered statistically significant.

Caudate volume repeated measure stability was assessed with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) (43). Caudate volumes of OCD patients and comparison subjects were compared by ANCOVA, with age, height, and weight as covariates. A p value of ≤0.05 (two-tailed) was considered statistically significant in these analyses also.

To establish whether estimated metabolite levels were related (because of physiology or quantification artifact), we did bivariate correlations between reliably quantified metabolites (coefficient of variation less than 75%). We also did bivariate correlations between metabolites that showed group differences and caudate volumes, and between these metabolites and symptom scores (Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale, CGI, and NIMH Obsessive-Compulsive Scale). Correlations were done independently for each subject group. Values for significance (p) for all correlations were determined on the basis of a Bonferroni correction (44), since there were no prior hypotheses.

RESULTS

Spectra from all 13 OCD patients and all 13 comparison subjects were quantified. A typical spectrum (after water removal) acquired from the left corpus striatum of one OCD patient is shown in figure 2. It is displayed in the frequency domain after Fourier transformation (45), although all quantification was done in the time domain. The average signal-to-noise ratio, measured as the N-acetylaspartate area divided by the root-mean-square of the noise level in the time domain, was 8.6:1 (SD=1.2:1) for the 13 comparison subject spectra and 8.0:1 (SD=1.6:1) for the 13 OCD patient spectra. The average full width at half maximum of the unsuppressed water spectra was 6.2 Hz (SD=0.7) for the comparison subjects and 6.7 Hz (SD=0.5) for the OCD patients.

Spectroscopy Results

Seven of the 12 quantified metabolites and two macromolecules had coefficients of variation less than 75% and were included in the statistical analysis. These included N-acetylaspartate, glutamate, gluta­mine, N-acetylaspartyl-glutamate, taurine, choline-containing compounds, and phosphocreatine plus creatine, as well as the macromolecules at 2.29 ppm and 3.00 ppm. The metabolites γ-aminobutyric acid, aspartate, glucose, scyllo-inositol, and myo-inositol and the macromolecule at 2.05 ppm were quantified with coefficients of variation greater than 75% and were therefore considered unreliable and excluded from the statistical analysis. Figure 3 shows the estimated metabolite and macromolecule levels of the metabolites included in the statistical analysis for each subject group. The groups differed with respect to N-acetylaspartate, which was significantly lower in the OCD patients than in the comparison subjects. The MANCOVA for the remaining six metabolites and two macromolecules listed above did not show an overall statistically significant difference between the OCD patients and comparison subjects (F=0.22, df=8, 14, p=0.98).

Volumetric Imaging Results

The ICCs for test-retest reliability were 0.86 and 0.90 for left and right caudate volumes, respectively. ANCOVA showed no differences between the patients with OCD and the comparison subjects in left caudate volume (mean=4.6 cm3, SD=0.7, and mean=4.4 cm3, SD=0.5, respectively; F=1.76, df=1, 21, p=0.20) or right caudate volume (mean=4.8 cm3, SD=0.7, and mean=4.6 cm3, SD=0.4, respectively; F=0.95, df=1, 21, p=0.34).

Bivariate Correlations

Plots of each correlation (available on request from the third author) were visually inspected and showed no evidence of outliers or anomalies that could give rise to false correlations. The correlations reported here were significant after Bonferroni correction (44). Metabolite correlations in the comparison group showed that glutamate was inversely correlated with glutamine (r=–0.70, df=11, p=0.007), and phosphocreatine plus creatine was positively correlated with the macromolecule at 2.29 ppm (r=0.76, df=11, p=0.003). In the OCD group, N-acetylaspartate was positively correlated with glutamate (r=0.75, df=11, p=0.003), and phosphocreatine plus creatine was positively correlated with choline (r=0.83, df=11, p<0.001) and with the macromolecule at 2.29 ppm (r=0.76, df=11, p=0.002). There were no significant correlations between N-acetylaspartate levels and symptom scores or left and right caudate volumes.

DISCUSSION

We found decreased levels of N-acetylaspartate in the left corpus striatum of OCD patients compared with healthy subjects, without a corresponding decrease in caudate volume. Recently, Ebert et al. (46) also independently reported decreased N-acetylaspartate levels in the right striatum of OCD patients compared with healthy subjects. Reduced N-acetylaspartate levels are often reported in disorders such as Alzheimer’s disease (47) that are associated with neuronal loss. In the absence of differences in caudate volume between groups in this study, the lower N-acetylaspartate levels in the OCD patients may indicate a greater sensitivity of this metabolite, compared with measurement of tissue volume, for the detection of neuronal loss (21). Our finding would be consistent with this interpretation and might explain the discrepancy among prior studies in the detection of differences in caudate volume in patients with OCD, since small-scale volume loss might not have been detectable. It remains to be determined whether age at onset, severity and duration of illness, or etiology might explain this apparent heterogeneity in caudate volumes among subjects. However, if replicated, our findings would support the notion that reduced neuronal density in the corpus striatum—albeit of a magnitude that is not readily detectable with the use of conventional imaging techniques—is a feature of many cases of OCD.

Since N-acetylaspartate is found primarily within neurons in the brain (20), reduced N-acetylaspartate levels suggest decreased neuronal density within the volume studied. What pathophysiologic processes might lead to this state? One attractive hypothesis is that neuronal loss leading to reduced N-acetylaspartate levels could result from an excitotoxic process caused by an increase in activity of afferent glutamatergic neurons from the prefrontal cortex. A recent functional MRI study (8) showed increased activation in the corpus striatum during symptom provocation of patients with OCD, suggesting that increased afferent input to this region—much of which is glutamatergic (48)—may be an important factor in the pathophysiology of OCD symptoms. However, previous PET and single photon emission computed tomography neutral-state studies have not consistently shown increased activity in the corpus striatum (4, 5). In interpreting the literature on brain function in OCD, however, one must consider that the interpretation of relative differences in either blood flow or glucose utilization in the corpus striatum might be confounded by actual differences in neuronal density between patients and comparison subjects. In fact, if reduced corpus striatum N-acetylaspartate is replicated in other studies of patients with OCD, an argument could be made in favor of correcting for neuronal density in functional studies of the corpus striatum in OCD.

There are undoubtedly several alternatives to a glutamatergic excitotoxic explanation for reduced corpus striatum neuronal density in OCD. Most promising among these explanations is the possibility that OCD may be caused by an autoimmune process (49–52). Antibodies directed against β-hemolytic strep­tococcus cross-react with corpus striatum neurons (53, 54). Damage to the corpus striatum caused by such a process could lead to decreased neuronal density and decreased N-acetylaspartate levels as were observed in this study. This damage, unless extensive, would not necessarily lead to volume changes that could be detected with conventional magnetic resonance morphometry.

There are a number of alternative explanations for our findings, as well as a number of unanswered questions. It is possible, for example, that changes in OCD occur selectively or predominantly in particular striatal structures (e.g., the caudate, the putamen) (16, 55, 56) rather than generally throughout the corpus striatum. Our voxel size and positioning were such that both the caudate and putamen were sampled, perhaps to differing degrees in different patients, leaving us unable to discern whether low N-acetylaspartate levels were confined to one or both of these structures. This possibility warrants more careful scrutiny in future studies.

Another possible explanation for the variability in caudate findings across the literature, and for the reduction of N-acetylaspartate in our particular patient group, may be that our patients lacked tic symptoms (55, 57). As others have suggested (15), heterogeneity within and among samples for the presence of tic symptoms may lie at the heart of the inconsistent caudate volume findings in OCD. This issue could be resolved by conducting a study where two groups of patients with OCD—one group with and one group without substantial tic symptoms—are included.

Ramifications of technical limitations must also be considered. Although the volume studied was small (4.5 cm3) and positioning was done with the aid of images to sample only the caudate (gray matter), all voxels contained partial volumes of the internal capsule (white matter) and putamen (gray matter). Since N-acetylaspartate levels measured by MRS are slightly higher in gray matter than white matter, a decrease in the ratio of gray matter to white matter within a volume of interest would result in a measured decrease of N-acetylaspartate level. Since no differences between the two groups in caudate volume were observed, it is unlikely that decreased gray matter content within the volume of interest studied in the OCD patients is the cause of observed differences in N-acetylaspartate levels. Furthermore, assuming N-acetylaspartate levels are 25% higher in gray matter than in white matter (35) and that the average comparison subject volume contained 60% gray matter and 40% white matter, if partial volume were the sole reason for the observed decrease in N-acetylaspartate levels (9%) in the OCD patients, the average OCD volume would have contained only 20% gray matter and 80% white matter, a highly unlikely scenario.

CONCLUSIONS

We found decreased levels of N-acetylaspartate in the left corpus striatum in the absence of volumetric changes of the left or right head of the caudate nucleus in OCD patients compared with healthy subjects. These findings suggest that there is decreased neuronal density within this region and support the view of OCD as a neuropsychiatric disorder involving an alteration in neural architecture within one or more components of a basal ganglia-thalamocortical neuronal circuit. Subsequent studies using spectroscopic techniques that permit more precise regional localization will be required to determine whether specific corpus striatum structures are selectively involved in the disorder. Such studies would benefit from careful attention to diagnostic subtype classification (tics, family history, age at onset, autoimmune etiology), which may serve to reduce patient heterogeneity and improve the precision of metabolite measurements.

Presented at the annual meeting of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, San Juan, Puerto Rico, Dec. 9–13, 1996, and the annual meeting of the International Society of Magnetic Resonance, Vancouver, Canada, April 12–18, 1997Received Nov. 19, 1997; ; revision received April 8, 1998; accepted May 28, 1998. From the Department of Nuclear Medicine and Magnetic Resonance, St. Joseph’s Health Centre, the Department of Psychiatry, and the Department of Psychology, University of Western Ontario, London; the Department of Psychiatry, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada; and the Department of Psychiatry, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla. Address reprint requests to Dr. Williamson, Department of Psychiatry, University Campus, London Health Sciences Centre, 339 Winder­mere Road, London, Ont., Canada N6A 5A5; (e-mail). Dr. Siddiqui died in August of 1996. Supported by a research grant from the St. Boniface General Hospital Research Foundation to Dr. Stein, grant MT-12078 from the Medical Research Council of Canada, and grant MH-50768 from NIMH.The authors thank Mission Air Transportation Network, Toronto, for providing transportation between Winnipeg and London for several of the patients in this study.

TABLE 1
FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1. Sagittal and Coronal 1H Magnetic Resonance Localizer Images Showing Placement of the Volume of Interest in the Left Corpus Striatum in a Study of Patients With Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder and Healthy Comparison Subjectsa

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2. Typical In Vivo 1H Spectroscopy Data From the Corpus Striatum (After Water Removal) for One Patient With Obsessive-Compulsive Disordera

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3. Box-and-Whisker Plot Showing Metabolite Levels After Normalization to Total Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Visible Water in the Corpus Striatum of Healthy Comparison Subjects and Patients With Obsessive-Compulsive Disordera

References

1. Koran LM, Thienemann ML, Davenport R: Quality of life for patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder. Am J Psychiatry 1996; 153:783–788LinkGoogle Scholar

2. Modell JG, Mountz JM, Curtis GC, Greden JF: Neurophysiologic dysfunction in basal ganglia/limbic striatal and thalamocortical circuits as a pathogenetic mechanism of obsessive-compulsive disorder. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 1989; 1:27–36Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

3. Insel TR: Toward a neuroanatomy of obsessive-compulsive disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1992; 49:739–744Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

4. Hoehn-Saric R, Benkelfat C: Structural and functional brain imaging in obsessive-compulsive disorder, in Current Insights in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder. Edited by Hollander E, Zohar J, Marazziti D, Olivier B. New York, John Wiley & Sons, 1994, pp 183–211Google Scholar

5. Baxter LR Jr, Schwartz JM, Bergman KS, Szuba MP, Guze BH, Mazziotta JC, Alazraki A, Selin CE, Ferng HK, Munford P, Phelps ME: Caudate glucose metabolic rate changes with both drug and behavior therapy for obsessive-compulsive disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1992; 49:681–689Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

6. Schwartz JM, Stoessel PW, Baxter LR Jr, Martin KM, Phelps ME: Systematic changes in cerebral glucose metabolic rate after successful behavior modification treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1996; 53:109–113Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

7. Rauch SL, Jenike MA, Alpert NM, Baer L, Breiter HCR, Savage CR, Fischman AJ: Regional cerebral blood flow measured during symptom provocation in obsessive-compulsive disorder using oxygen 15-labeled carbon dioxide and positron emission tomography. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1994; 51:62–70Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

8. Breiter HC, Rauch SL, Kwong KK, Baker JR, Weisskoff RM, Kennedy DN, Kendrick AD, Davis TL, Jiang A, Cohen MS, Stem CE, Belliveau JW, Baer L, O’Sullivan RL, Savage CR, Jenike MA, Rosen BR: Functional magnetic resonance imaging of symptom provocation in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1996; 53:595–606Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

9. Swerdlow NR, Benbow CH, Zisook S, Geyer MA, Braff DL: A preliminary assessment of sensorimotor gating in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder. Biol Psychiatry 1993; 33:298–301Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

10. Enright SJ, Beech AR: Reduced cognitive inhibition in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Br J Clin Psychol 1993; 32:67–74Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

11. Kellner CH, Jolley RR, Holgate RC, Austin L, Lydiard RB, Laraia M, Ballenger JC: Brain MRI in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Psychiatry Res 1991; 36:45–49Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

12. Scarone S, Colombo C, Livian S, Abbruzzese M, Ronchi P, Locatelli M, Scotti G: Increased right caudate size in obsessive-compulsive disorder: detection with magnetic resonance imaging. Psychiatry Res: Neuroimaging 1992; 45:115–121Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

13. Robinson D, Wu H, Munne RA, Ashtari M, Alvir JM, Lerner G, Koreen A, Cole K, Bogerts B: Reduced caudate nucleus volume in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1995; 52:393–398Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

14. Aylward EH, Harris GJ, Hoehn-Saric R, Barta PE, Machlin SR, Pearlson GD: Normal caudate nucleus in obsessive-compulsive disorder assessed by quantitative neuroimaging. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1996; 53:577–584Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

15. Jenike MA, Breiter JC, Baer L, Kennedy DN, Savage CR, Olivares MJ, O’Sullivan RL, Shera DM, Rauch SL, Keuthen N, Rosen BR, Caviness VS, Filipek PA: Cerebral structural abnormalities in obsessive-compulsive disorder: a quantitative morphometric magnetic resonance imaging study. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1996; 53:625–632Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

16. Rosenberg DR, Keshavan MS, O’Hearn KM, Dick EL, Bagwell WW, Seymour AB, Montrose DM, Pierri JN, Birmaher B: Frontostriatal morphology in treatment-naïve children with obsessive-compulsive disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1997; 54:824–830Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

17. Dager SR, Steen RG: Applications of magnetic resonance spectroscopy to the investigation of neuropsychiatric disorders. Neuropsychopharmacology 1992; 6:249–266MedlineGoogle Scholar

18. Stanley JA, Drost DJ, Williamson PC, Carr TJ: In vivo proton MRS study of glutamate and schizophrenia, in NMR Spectroscopy in Psychiatric Brain Disorders. Edited by Nasrallah HA, Pettegrew JH. Washington, DC, American Psychiatric Press, 1995, pp 21–44Google Scholar

19. Michaelis T, Merboldt K-D, Bruhn H, Hanicke W, Math D, Frahm J: Absolute concentrations of metabolites in the adult human brain in vivo: quantification of localized proton MR spectra. Radiology 1993; 187:219–227Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

20. Urenjak J, Williams SR, Gadian DG, Noble M: Specific expression of N-acetylaspartate in neurons, oligodendrocyte type 2 astrocyte progenitors, and immature oligodendroctyes in vitro. J Neurochem 1992; 59:55–61Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

21. Ebisu T, Rooney WD, Graham SH, Weiner MW, Maudsley AA: N-Acetylaspartate as an in vivo marker of neuronal viability in kainate-induced status epilepticus: 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1994; 14:373–382Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

22. Cendes F, Andermann F, Preul MC, Arnold DL: Lateralization of temporal lobe epilepsy based on regional metabolic abnormalities in proton magnetic resonance spectroscopic images. Ann Neurol 1994; 35:211–216Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

23. First MB, Spitzer RL, Gibbon M, Williams JBW: Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders, Patient Edition (SCID-P), version 2. New York, New York State Psychiatric Institute, Biometrics Research, 1995Google Scholar

24. Goodman WK, Price LH, Rasmussen SA, Mazure C, Fleisch­mann RL, Hill CL, Heninger GR, Charney DS: The Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale, I: development, use, and reliability. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1989; 46:1006–1011Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

25. Goodman WK, Price LH, Rasmussen SA, Mazure C, Delgado P, Heninger GR, Charney DS: The Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale, II: validity. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1989; 46:1012–1016Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

26. Guy W (ed): ECDEU Assessment Manual for Psychopharmacology: Publication ADM 76-338. Rockville, Md, US Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, 1976, pp 217–222Google Scholar

27. Murphy DL, Pickar D, Alterman IS: Methods for the quantitative assessment of depressive and manic behavior, in The Behavior of Psychiatric Patients. Edited by Burdock EI, Sudilovsky A, Gershon S. New York, Marcel Dekker, 1982, pp 355–391Google Scholar

28. Bryden P: Measuring handedness with questionnaires. Neuropsychologia 1977; 15:617–624Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

29. Bartha R, Williamson PC, Drost DJ, Malla A, Carr TJ, Cortese L, Canaran G, Rylett RJ, Neufeld RWJ: Measurement of glutamate and glutamine in the medial prefrontal cortex of never-treated schizophrenic patients and healthy controls by proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1997; 54:959–965Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

30. Talairach J, Tournoux P: Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain. New York, Thieme Medical, 1988Google Scholar

31. Frahm J, Michaelis T, Merboldt KD, Bruhn H, Gyngell ML, Hanicke W: Improvements in localized proton NMR spectroscopy of human brain: water suppression, short echo times, and 1 ml resolution. J Magn Reson 1990; 90:464–473Google Scholar

32. Frahm J, Merboldt KD, Hanicke W: Localized proton spectroscopy using stimulated echoes. J Magn Reson 1987; 72:502–508Google Scholar

33. Bartha R, Drost DJ, Stanley J, Williamson PC: A comparison between time and frequency domain quantification of short echo 1H MR spectra (abstract), in Proceedings of the Third Society of Magnetic Resonance Meeting. Berkeley, Calif, Society of Magnetic Resonance, 1995, p 1946Google Scholar

34. Provencher SW: Estimation of metabolite concentrations from localized in-vivo proton NMR spectra. Magn Reson Med 1994; 30:672–679CrossrefGoogle Scholar

35. Stanley JA, Drost DJ, Williamson PC, Thompson RT: The use of a priori knowledge to quantify short echo in vivo 1H MR spectra. Magn Reson Med 1995; 34:17–24Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

36. Ross B, Michaelis T: Clinical applications of magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Magn Reson Q 1994; 10:191–247MedlineGoogle Scholar

37. Behar KL, Rothman DL, Spencer DD, Petroff OAC: Analysis of macromolecule resonances in 1H NMR spectra of human brain. Magn Reson Med 1994; 32:294–302Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

38. Haase A, Frahm J, Matthaei KD: FLASH imaging: rapid NMR imaging using low flip angles. J Magn Reson 1986; 67:258–266Google Scholar

39. Robb RA: A software system for interactive and quantitative analysis of biomedical images, in 3D Imaging in Medicine: NATO ASI Series, vol F60. Edited by Hohne KH, Fuchs H, Pizer SM. Berlin, Springer-Verlag, 1990, pp 333–361Google Scholar

40. Norusis MJ: SPSS for Windows Base System User"s Guide and Advanced Statistics, Release 6.0. Chicago, SPSS 1993Google Scholar

41. Cochran WG: Analysis of covariance: its nature and uses. Biometrics 1957; 13:261–281CrossrefGoogle Scholar

42. Lees MC, Neufeld RWJ: Matching the limits of clinical inference to the limits of quantitative methods: a formal appeal to practice what we persistently preach. Can Psychol 1994; 35:268–282CrossrefGoogle Scholar

43. Fleiss J: The Design and Analysis of Clinical Experiments. New York, John Wiley & Sons, 1988Google Scholar

44. Larzelere RE, Mulaik SA: Single sample tests for many comparisons. Psychol Bull 1977; 4:557–569CrossrefGoogle Scholar

45. Brigham EO: The Fast Fourier Transform. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice-Hall, 1974, pp 11–30Google Scholar

46. Ebert D, Speck O, Konig A, Berger M, Hennig J, Hohagen F: 1H-Magnetic resonance spectroscopy in obsessive-compulsive disorder: evidence for neuronal loss in the cingulate gyrus and the right striatum. Psychiatry Res: Neuroimaging 1997; 74:173–176Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

47. MacKay S, Ezekiel F, Di Sclafani V, Meyerhoff DJ, Gerson J, Norman D, Fein G, Weiner MW: Alzheimer disease and subcortical ischemic vascular dementia: evaluation by combining MR imaging segmentation and H-1 MR spectroscopic imaging. Radiology 1996; 198:537–545Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

48. Alexander GE, Crutcher MD, DeLong MR: Basal ganglia-thalamocortical circuits: parallel substrates for motor, oculomotor, “prefrontal” and “limbic” functions, in Progress in Brain Research. Edited by Uylings HBM, Van Eden CG, De Bruin JPC, Feenstra MGP. New York, Elsevier, 1990, pp 119–146Google Scholar

49. Swedo SE, Leonard HL, Kiessling LS: Speculations on antineuronal antibody mediated neuropsychiatric disorders of childhood. Pediatrics 1994; 93:323–326MedlineGoogle Scholar

50. Kiessling LS, Marcotte AC, Culpepper L: Antineuronal antibodies: tics and obsessive-compulsive symptoms. J Dev Behav Pediatr 1994; 15:421–425Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

51. Swedo SE, Leonard HL, Mittleman BB, Allen AJ, Rapoport JL, Dow SP, Kanter ME, Chapman F, Zabriskie J: Identification of children with pediatric autoimmune neuropsychiatric disorders associated with streptococcal infections by a marker associated with rheumatic fever. Am J Psychiatry 1997; 154:110–112LinkGoogle Scholar

52. Murphy TK, Goodman WK, Fudge MW, Williams RC Jr, Ayoub EM, Dalal M, Lewis MH, Zabriskie JB: B lymphocyte antigen D8/17: a peripheral marker for childhood-onset obsessive-compulsive disorder and Tourette’s syndrome? Am J Psychiatry 1997; 154:402–407Google Scholar

53. Bronze MS, Dale JB: Epitopes of streptococcal M proteins that evoke antibodies that cross-react with human brain. J Immunol 1993; 151:2820–2828MedlineGoogle Scholar

54. Husby G, van de Rijn I, Zabriskie JB, Abdin ZH, Williams RC Jr: Antibodies reacting with cytoplasm of subthalamic and caudate nuclei neurons in chorea and acute rheumatic fever. J Exp Med 1976; 144:1094–1110Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

55. Peterson B, Riddle MA, Cohen DJ, Katz LD, Smith JC, Hardin MT, Leckman JF: Reduced basal ganglia volumes in Tour­ette’s syndrome using three-dimensional reconstruction techniques from magnetic resonance images. Neurology 1993; 43:941–949Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

56. Singer HS, Reiss AL, Brown JE, Aylward EH, Shih B, Chee E, Harris EL, Reader MJ, Chase GA, Bryan RN, Denckla MB: Volumetric MRI changes in basal ganglia of children with Tourette’s syndrome. Neurology 1993; 43:950–956Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

57. Holzer JC, Goodman WK, McDougle CJ, Baer L, Boyarsky BK, Leckman JF, Price LH: Obsessive-compulsive disorder with and without a chronic tic disorder: a comparison of symptoms in 70 patients. Br J Psychiatry 1994; 164:469–473Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar