The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×

To the Editor: Conversion disorder, formerly known as hysteria, is thought to symptomatically manifest in the sensory-motor domains as a result of emotional distress (1). The prevailing neurocircuitry models based on functional MRI (fMRI) studies of patients with conversion paralysis support this view by suggesting an association of frontolimbic hyperfunction and suppressed motor responses (2). Less is known, however, about the neural signature of visual conversion disorder. While two recent fMRI studies have documented altered, but not absent, visual cortex responses in patients with conversion blindness (3, 4), it remains unclear whether the neural processing of symptom-related cues is preserved.

We report here on a 25-year-old man who fulfilled DSM-IV criteria for visual conversion disorder after experiencing recurrent brief episodes of medically unexplained complete bilateral visual loss. These episodes had occurred since he was 17 years old when his close boyhood friend accidentally died from autoerotic asphyxiation. The current episode was preceded by overwhelming feelings of guilt and visual pseudo-hallucinations showing his deceased friend’s face grimacing with agony. In an attempt to elucidate the underlying neurocircuitry using fMRI, we scanned the patient during the episode of conversion blindness and after spontaneous remission 5 days later, thus enabling intra-individual comparison of neural activity during symptomatic and asymptomatic states in the absence of pharmacotherapy.

Our fMRI data analysis confirmed the presence of unaltered basic visual cortex responses to checkerboard stimulation (Figure 1A) during conversion blindness (3, 4). In contrast, analysis of higher-order visual responses to complex stimuli (a social-emotional perception task) revealed hypofunction in the occipital cortex and hyperfunction in the postcentral gyrus bilaterally and the right superior temporal gyrus (Figure 1B). The extraction of emotion-specific activity yielded increased responses in the angular gyrus bilaterally, the left medial frontal gyrus, and the left anterior cingulate cortex—regions implicated in a variety of brain functions including emotional regulation and moral reasoning (Figure 1C). A psychophysiological-interactions analysis revealed enhanced functional coupling of this network with down-regulated visual areas (Figure 1D).

FIGURE 1. Visual Tasks and fMRI in a Study of Conversion Blindnessa

a Panel A displays the functional MRI paradigms employed to probe basic and higher-order visual processing in a patient with conversion blindness. Panels B–D display the neural response and functional connectivity changes during presence relative to absence of conversion blindness. All results are family-wise error corrected at the cluster level (p<0.05). OCC=occipital cortex; ACC=anterior cingulate cortex; MFG=medial frontal gyrus; ANG=angular gyrus; PCG=postcentral gyrus.

Taken together, our findings may help extend current neurocircuitry models of visual conversion disorder by proposing a symptom-related functional association of overactivity in fronto-parietal regions and suppressed responses in interconnected visual areas.

From the Department of Psychiatry, University of Bonn, Germany, and the German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn.

The authors report no financial relationships with commercial interests.

Dr. Hurlemann was supported by a German Research Foundation grant (HU-1302/2-2) and by a Starting Independent Researcher Grant (Neuromodulation of Emotion) jointly provided by the Ministry of Innovation, Science, Research, and Technology of the German State of North Rhine-Westphalia and the University of Bonn, Germany.

References

1 Reynolds EH: Hysteria, conversion and functional disorders: a neurological contribution to classification issues. Br J Psychiatry 2012; 201:253–254Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

2 Vuilleumier P: Hysterical conversion and brain function. Prog Brain Res 2005; 150:309–329Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

3 Werring DJ, Weston L, Bullmore ET, Plant GT, Ron MA: Functional magnetic resonance imaging of the cerebral response to visual stimulation in medically unexplained visual loss. Psychol Med 2004; 34:583–589Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

4 Schoenfeld MA, Hassa T, Hopf JM, Eulitz C, Schmidt R: Neural correlates of hysterical blindness. Cereb Cortex 2011; 21:2394–2398Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar