The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×

To the Editor: We appreciate Dr. Rappaport’s comments on our article. We described a heuristic case that involved an adolescent with psychosis and a risk for violence at school. Because of space limitations, we were unable to include several key aspects of clinical care. As educators as well as clinicians, we consistently remind those who we teach about the importance of close communication with school personnel regarding the functioning of our patients, wherever they may be on the spectrum of risk to others. In hindsight, including content that stressed the importance of close communication between the clinician and school personnel could have strengthened our article. We agree that the use of a systematic assessment of violence risk is essential. However, it is our opinion that a reductionistic tendency of systems to rely on only one approach of risk assessment—as we have frequently seen in our own clinical practices—often does not lead to optimal placements for young, school-age patients.

Cleveland, Ohio

The authors’ disclosures accompany the original article.

This letter (doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2008.08030327r) was accepted for publication in April 2008.