The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×

To the Editor: As part of an ongoing treatment study of co-occurring bipolar mania and cannabis abuse in adolescents, we obtained bimonthly urine toxicology screens using the Status DS immunoassay. We found that the first five subjects initially tested negative for tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs), but all five tested positive after being treated with topiramate or placebo and quetiapine. All of the patients denied using TCAs but were forthcoming regarding their drug use. A quetiapine trough blood level was obtained the same morning that urine toxicology screens were performed, and the results paralleled TCA toxicology findings (i.e., when subjects showed quetiapine in their serum [5.1–85 ng/ml], they tested positive for TCAs). However, when two of the subjects were nonadherent to their medications and their quetiapine levels were undetectable, their toxicology screens were negative for TCAs. After these two patients were encouraged to take their medications and had detectable quetiapine levels, they once again tested positive for TCAs.

The structure of quetiapine is similar to that of TCAs (both contain a similar tricyclic framework), and there have been two prior case reports in the literature that noted false positives for TCAs in adult patients who were receiving quetiapine treatment (1 , 2) . Three in vitro studies (13) found false positive TCA results in some immunoassays using concentrations as low as 160 ng/ml of quetiapine. To our knowledge, there have been no prior reports of cannabis use or topiramate use causing false positives for TCAs. Therefore, we concluded that treatment with quetiapine was the cause of the positive TCA toxicology screens in our subjects, which occurred even at levels close to the detection threshold (as low as 5.1 ng/ml). Doses of quetiapine ranged from 300–600 mg, and there was a high variability in serum levels between subjects for a specific dose of quetiapine. These data are consistent with prior research that reported only modest to no correlation between dose and serum concentration with high intersubject variability and no correlation with therapeutic effectiveness (4 , 5) . Adolescents with bipolar disorder are poorly adherent to medications. Therefore, qualitative measures of quetiapine may be useful to determine whether patients are medication adherent. Our findings suggest that certain immunoassays for TCAs are useful as a qualitative test for quetiapine adherence and may avoid the need for more expensive serum level tests. Nevertheless, physicians should be aware of this potential cross-reactivity in patients being treated with quetiapine.

Cincinnati, Ohio

Dr. Anthenelli has received research support from Johnson and Johnson. Dr. DelBello has received research support from AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly, Johnson and Johnson, Pfizer, Shire, Janssen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Otsuka, and Repligen; she has received consulting fees from Eli Lilly, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Johnson and Johnson, and Bristol-Myers Squibb; she has received lecture fees from AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Pfizer, and Bristol-Myers Squibb; she has also served on the speakers bureaus of GlaxoSmithKline; and she has received fees from Abbott Laboratories. Dr. Cerullo, Ms. Albertz, and Ms. Bell report no competing interests.

AstraZeneca provided the medications for the study.

Supported by research grant NIDA DA022221 (Dr. DelBello).

This letter (doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2007.07060885) was accepted for publication in November 2007.

Reprints are not available; however, Letters to the Editor can be downloaded at http://ajp.psychiatryonline.org.

References

1. Sloan KL, Haver VM, Saxon AJ: Quetiapine and false-positive urine drug testing for tricyclic antidepressants. Am J Psychiatry 2000; 157:148–149Google Scholar

2. Hendrickson RG, Morocco AP: Quetiapine cross-reactivity among three tricyclic antidepressant immunoassays. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 2003; 41:105–108Google Scholar

3. Caraveti EM, Juenke JM, Crouch BI, Anderson KT: Quetiapine cross-reactivity with plasma tricyclic antidepressant immunoassays. Ann Pharmacother 2005; 39:1446–1449Google Scholar

4. Schwarz MJ: Therapeutic drug monitoring of quetiapine and its major metabolites quetiapine-sulfoxide and 7-hydroxy-quetiapine. Eur Psychiatry 2005; 20(suppl 1):S209Google Scholar

5. Kohnlein O, Lutz R, Schmau M, Messter T: Determining serum concentrations of the modern antipsychotic quetiapine: clinical relevance in therapeutic drug monitoring. Psychiatrische Praxis 2004; 31:S175–S177Google Scholar