The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×
Letter to the EditorFull Access

Olanzapine and Haloperidol for Residual Symptoms

To the Editor: Robert W. Buchanan, M.D., and colleagues (1) conducted an important study on the comparative effect of olanzapine and haloperidol on residual positive and negative symptoms in 63 outpatients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia. They concluded that olanzapine has limited differential benefit for positive and negative symptoms in these patients. However, we think that the correct conclusion must be that olanzapine has no benefit over haloperidol. Namely, the authors could not find superior efficacy for olanzapine for positive and negative symptoms, and the main side effects (extrapyramidal symptoms for haloperidol and weight gain for olanzapine) seem to balance each other out. The authors stated that “the magnitude of weight gain…may potentially offset the more benign extrapyramidal symptom profile of olanzapine” (p. 128). Furthermore, we would like to point out that the mean doses of olanzapine (20.3 mg/day) and haloperidol (18.3 mg/day) resulted in noncomparable dopamine D2 receptor occupancy. For almost all patients receiving a dose of about 18 mg/day of haloperidol, the balance between efficacy and extrapyramidal side effects is not optimal (2, 3). Haloperidol at lower doses is thought to induce fewer extrapyramidal side effects and fewer neuroleptic-induced negative symptoms and dysphoria (4) without a change in efficacy on positive symptoms (2). Lower haloperidol doses might even further diminish the benefit of olanzapine for extrapyramidal symptoms.

Therefore, the sobering conclusion of this study seems to be that neither olanzapine nor haloperidol shows benefits for outpatients with schizophrenia who met criteria for either residual positive or residual negative symptoms.

References

1. Buchanan RW, Ball MP, Weiner E, Kirkpatrick B, Gold JM, McMahon RP, Carpenter WT Jr: Olanzapine treatment of residual positive and negative symptoms. Am J Psychiatry 2005; 162:124–129LinkGoogle Scholar

2. Bollini P, Pampallona S, Orza MJ, Adams ME, Chalmers TC: Antipsychotic drugs: is more worse? a meta-analysis of the published randomised control trials. Psychol Med 1994, 24:307–316Google Scholar

3. Kapur SJ, Zipursky R, Jones C, Remington G, Houle S: Relationship between dopamine D2 occupancy, clinical response, and side effects: a double-blind PET study of first-episode schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry 2000; 157:514–520LinkGoogle Scholar

4. de Haan L, van Bruggen M, Lavalaye J, Booij J, Dingemans PMAJ, Linszen D: Subjective experience and D2 receptor occupancy in patients with recent-onset schizophrenia treated with low-dose olanzapine or haloperidol: a randomized, double-blind study. Am J Psychiatry 2003; 160:303–309LinkGoogle Scholar