The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×
Letter to the EditorFull Access

Benztropine Equivalents for Antimuscarinic Medication

To the Editor: Michael J. Minzenberg, M.D., et al. (1) are to be congratulated for developing a benztropine equivalent table, as we previously did (2), by reviewing in vitro studies and asking experienced clinicians. However, measuring serum antimuscarinic activity may provide better knowledge (3).

The in vitro literature (1, 2) suggests that haloperidol has negligible antimuscarinic binding activity (10 g of haloperidol equals 1 mg of benztropine) (2). Although our senior pharmacologist also concluded that the clinical antimuscarinic binding activity of haloperidol was negligible (2), the psychiatrists working with Dr. Minzenberg et al. proposed that 13 mg of haloperidol equals 1 mg of benztropine (1). Our recent study (3) also suggested that haloperidol probably has negligible antimuscarinic clinical activity. The mean serum antimuscarinic activity in pmol/ml in 16 patients taking haloperidol was 0.40 (95% confidence interval [CI]=0.30–0.51). This low serum antimuscarinic activity appeared to represent nonspecific antimuscarinic binding (the “noise” of the measuring system) since haloperidol levels (or doses) were not correlated with serum antimuscarinic activity.

Clozapine differs in that its in vitro tables suggest that 1 mg of benztropine equals 15 mg (2) or 8 mg (1) of clozapine; the clinical tables suggest that 1 mg of benztropine equals 375 mg (2) or 85 mg (1) of clozapine. Our recent study agreed that clozapine probably has important antimuscarinic activity (3). The mean serum antimuscarinic activity in 20 patients taking antiparkinsonian medications with mean doses of two benztropine equivalents was approximately 1 pmol/ml (1.05, 95% CI=0.66–1.44) (3). The antimuscarinic activity of 100 mg/day of clozapine in 17 patients was approximately 1 pmol/ml (1.38, 95% CI=0.83–1.93). The mean antimuscarinic activity of 300 mg/day of clozapine in 25 patients was approximately 2 pmol/ml (1.91, 95% CI=1.42–2.40). The mean antimuscarinic activity of 600 mg/day of clozapine in 27 patients was approximately 3 pmol/ml (2.81, 95% CI=2.16–3.46).

To estimate clozapine equivalence, one can approximate that 1 benztropine equivalent equals 0.5 pmol/ml of serum antimuscarinic activity. Using the serum muscarinic activity data of the three clozapine doses, one can estimate that 1 mg of benztropine equals 50 mg of clozapine (obtained from the 100-mg data) to 75 mg of clozapine (obtained from the 300-mg data) to 100 mg of clozapine (obtained from the 600-mg data). Thus, the clozapine equivalent of 1 mg/day of benztropine ranges from 50 to 100 mg/day of clozapine. The misleading fact that clozapine is an agonist for some muscarinic receptors, the M4, and may cause hypersalivation instead of dry mouth may confound clinicians.

References

1. Minzenberg MJ, Poole JH, Benton C, Vinogradov S: Association of anticholinergic load with impairment of complex attention and memory in schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry 2004; 161:116–124LinkGoogle Scholar

2. de Leon J, Canuso C, White AO, Simpson GM: A pilot effort to determine benztropine equivalents of anticholinergic medications. Hosp Community Psychiatry 1994; 45:606–607AbstractGoogle Scholar

3. de Leon J, Odom-White A, Josiassen RC, Diaz FJ, Cooper TB, Simpson GM: Serum muscarinic activity during clozapine treatment. J Clin Psychopharmacol 2003; 23:336–341Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar