The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×
Letter to the EditorFull Access

Dr. Young Replies

To the Editor: I am pleased to reply to Dr. Rosen’s thoughtful comments on my review of Lamb’s I Know This Much Is True. I agree that this book reveals many truths about mental health practice in the current environment. As he points out, the role of effective psychotherapy practice and teaching has diminished in importance for many psychiatrists.

However, while Lamb’s novel may reflect this truth, it also provides a decidedly inaccurate portrayal of modern psychiatry and psychiatrists. Indeed, the blurring of roles between patients and therapists has been a popular theme in books and cinema for some time. This trend predates managed care and the changes in our practice environment by many years. An excellent example is Conroy’s Prince of Tides(1), published in 1986 (quite early in the managed care era in American psychiatry). In this novel, in which a psychotherapeutic relationship is also central, numerous boundaries between patient and therapist become blurred. Their relationship evolves into a sexual one. The clear message is that the relationship’s intimacy, both emotional and sexual, is what heals the patient. Gabbard and Gabbard (2) documented numerous other examples from the world of cinema. The truth reflected in these examples, including I Know This Much Is True, may be the age-old fantasy of the patient who wishes to break through the confines of the therapeutic alliance and enjoin the therapist in a “real” relationship.

My problems with Lamb stem from his overly dramatized descriptions, especially of the forensic facility. The hospital is depicted as an out-of-control, nonempathic, and dangerous place. For example, on the night of Thomas’s admission, a security officer assaults his brother. Later the brother uses this incident to blackmail the staff into providing freedoms for his brother. Having worked in a number of forensic settings, I found this depiction to be unfair and inaccurate.

Nonetheless, Lamb has crafted a wonderful novel that depicts struggles between siblings and generations in a unique and often moving way. I just wish the psychiatrists had been portrayed with a bit more empathy and realism. Current and future patients will read this book. To some extent, we have a duty to speak up and educate them about what is real and what truly is fiction.

References

1. Conroy P: The Prince of Tides. Boston, Houghton Mifflin, 1986Google Scholar

2. Gabbard K, Gabbard GO: Psychiatry and the Cinema. Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1987Google Scholar