The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The authors’ goal was to replicate a previous finding that smokers have lower brain monoamine oxidase B (MAO-B) levels than comparison nonsmoking subjects and to determine if levels recover after overnight cigarette abstinence. METHOD: Brain MAO-B levels were measured by means of positron emission tomography in six smokers who were scanned twice: 11.3 hours (baseline) and 10 minutes after smoking one cigarette. RESULTS: Average MAO-B levels in smokers in the present study were similar to those found in the previous study and averaged 39% (SD=17) lower than those found in a comparison group of nonsmokers. Brain MAO-B levels did not differ between baseline levels and 10 minutes after smoking. CONCLUSIONS: This study reinforces the need to investigate whether MAO-B inhibition may account for some of the behavioral and epidemiological features of smoking.

We reported in the last few years that smokers have brain monoamine oxidase B (MAO-B) values averaging about 40% lower than those of nonsmokers and former smokers (1). MAO-B breaks down dopamine and also generates hydrogen peroxide, raising questions as to whether lower levels of MAO-B in smokers than in nonsmokers may contribute to smoking behaviors and epidemiology.

We report here a replication of our previous study in another group of smokers in whom we also determined whether MAO-B activity recovered after overnight cigarette abstinence.

Method

Six healthy smokers (one woman and five men; mean age=39 years, SD=13) were recruited by means of advertisement. Subjects with a history of neurologic or psychiatric disorder, head trauma with loss of consciousness, or alcohol or substance abuse (except for caffeine and nicotine) were excluded. Prescan tests ensured the absence of psychoactive drug use. The average age of the combined group of six smokers from this study and eight smokers from the previous study was 42.3 years (SD=13.4). One smoker participated in both studies. After receiving a complete description of the study, the subjects gave their written informed consent. Positron emission tomography (PET) scans were performed on a positron emission tomograph (Siemens EXACT HR+, Knoxville, Tenn.) (63 slices, 4.5 × 4.5 × 2.4 mm full width at half maximum). Each subject had two PET scans (2 hours apart) by means of [11C]L-deprenyl-D2 (4–9 mCi, specific activity=0.2 Ci/μmol at time of injection): at baseline (mean=11.3 hours after smoking last cigarette, SD=3.2) and 10 minutes after smoking one cigarette by means of the procedure and timing described previously (2, 3). The previous study was performed on a different scanner (Siemens CTI 931, Knoxville, Tenn.) (6.5 × 6.5 × 6.5 mm full width at half maximum) (1).

Subjects were asked to have their last cigarette the night before the study and to refrain from smoking the morning of the study. Before the first PET scan and 10 minutes after beginning to smoke one regular cigarette (duration=5–10 minutes), subjects provided a breath sample for carbon monoxide analysis (by means of a Vitalograph, Lenexa, Kan.), and a blood sample was taken for nicotine and cotinine analysis to support their claims of overnight abstinence (nicotine levels) and for correlations of MAO-B levels and smoking dose (cotinine levels) (4, 5).

Thirty healthy nonsmokers (mean age=41.7 years, SD=12.8) from other studies (3, 6, 7) made up a comparison group. Sixteen were scanned on the HR+ scanner, and 14 were scanned on the CTI 931 scanner.

PET time-activity data from 10 brain regions, including the global region (Figure 1), and tracer concentration in arterial plasma were used to calculate the model terms K1 (the plasma-to-brain transfer constant that is related to blood flow) and λk3 (a function of MAO-B activity) by means of a three-compartment model (8), where k3 is related to the binding of radiotracer to MAO-B in brain tissue, λ is defined as K1/k2, and k2 is a term related to the efflux of tracer from the brain to the blood.

Average values for λk3 and K1 and arterial plasma concentrations for smokers and nonsmokers were compared by means of unpaired t tests, two-tailed. The degree of MAO-B inhibition in each smoker was determined by comparing individual λk3 to the nonsmokers’ mean for global value. The model terms λk3 and K1 for each brain region, the plasma nicotine and cotinine concentrations, and the expired carbon monoxide levels were compared for scan 1 (baseline) and scan 2 (after smoking) by means of a paired t test, two-tailed. Data from the two scanners were analyzed separately as well as together. Pearson product-moment correlations were performed between the percentage of MAO-B inhibition of individual smokers, plasma cotinine and nicotine concentrations, and numbers of cigarettes smoked per day.

Results

Results from the two scanners did not differ, and thus the results presented here are for the combined groups. The average global brain MAO-B level (as λk3) was 0.17 (SD=0.03) for the 30 nonsmokers and 0.10 (SD=0.03) for the 13 smokers (t=7.50, df=41, p<0.0001) (Figure 1). There was a higher arterial tracer concentration in smokers than in nonsmokers, although the difference did not reach significance (t=–1.90, df=39, p<0.07). The average brain MAO-B inhibition was 39% (SD=17%), with a range of 10%–77% for the 13 smoking subjects from the two studies. One of the smokers had values of 75% and 77% less MAO-B inhibition in the studies, which were 4 years apart, than nonsmoking comparison subjects. There was no significant difference in λk3 (or K1; data not shown) between the two scans for any brain region examined (Figure 1). Plasma nicotine levels differed at baseline and after smoking, averaging 2.8 ng/ml (SD=2.0) and 18.3 ng/ml (SD=7.5), respectively (t=–6.37, df=5, p=0.001), whereas plasma cotinine levels did not differ. Expired carbon monoxide was generally higher in the smokers immediately after smoking than in the nonsmoking comparison subjects, but this level did not reach significance. There was no significant correlation between the percentage of brain MAO-B inhibition and plasma cotinine or nicotine concentrations or the number of cigarettes smoked per day.

Discussion

This study replicates the finding that smokers have lower brain MAO-B levels that nonsmokers (1) and shows that brain MAO-B does not measurably recover after an 11-hour abstinence in smokers. The degree of inhibition appears to be stable over time, since repeated measures were similar in one smoker who participated in studies 4 years apart (Figure 1).

Nicotine does not inhibit MAO-B (9). The lack of an association between MAO-B levels and the number of cigarettes smoked per day is consistent with evidence that smoking behavior, rather than the number of cigarettes smoked, controls the dose of nicotine (and presumably other substances in cigarettes) (4). We note that an MAO inhibitory compound was recently isolated from tobacco leaves (10).

This study reinforces the need to report smoking status in clinical studies and to reevaluate reports that low MAO-B inhibition is a biological marker in clinical populations where the rate of smoking is high. For example, normal platelet MAO levels were recently reported in nonsmoking patients with schizophrenia (11). Smoking remains a major public health problem; however, advances in treating smoking addiction hinge on characterizing both the neuropharmacological effects of tobacco smoke and the factors accounting for individual variability in smoking toxicity.

Received Nov. 9, 1999; revision received April 26, 2000; accepted May 3, 2000. From Brookhaven National Laboratory; and the Department of Psychiatry, State University of New York at Stony Brook. Address reprint requests to Dr. Fowler, Chemistry Department, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY 11973; (e-mail). Supported by a U.S. Department of Energy contract (DE-AC02-98CH10886) and NIH grants from the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS-15380) and the National Institute on Drug Abuse (DA-06278). The authors thank Richard Ferrieri, Robert Carciello, Donald Warner, David Alexoff, and David Schlyer for cyclotron and PET operations; Noelwah Netusil and Pauline Carter for nursing care; Lois Caligiuri for organization and administration; Thomas Cooper for plasma nicotine and cotinine analyses; and the study volunteers.

Figure 1.

Figure 1. Relation of Age to Brain MAO-B Levels in Nonsmokers and Smokers and Regional Brain MAO-B Levels in Smokers 11.3 Hours and 10 Minutes After Smoking Last Cigarette

aRegression line shows increase in MAO-B levels with age for all nonsmokers (6) (R=0.42, R2=0.18, F=6.11, df=29, p<0.02).

bSubject participated in two studies 4 years apart.

cNo significant differences in MAO-B levels among brain regions (global value: paired t test=–0.70, df=5, p=0.52).

References

1. Fowler JS, Volkow ND, Wang GJ, Pappas N, Logan J, MacGregor R, Alexoff D, Shea C, Wolf AP, Warner D, Zezulkova I, Cilento R: Inhibition of monoamine oxidase B in the brains of smokers. Nature 1996; 379:733–736Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

2. Fowler JS, Wang GJ, Logan J, Xie S, Volkow ND, MacGregor RR, Schlyer DJ, Pappas N, Alexoff DL, Patlak C, Wolf AP: Selective reduction of radiotracer trapping by deuterium substitution: comparison of carbon-11-L-deprenyl and carbon-11-deprenyl-D2 for MAO B mapping. J Nucl Med 1995; 36:1255–1262Google Scholar

3. Fowler JS, Wang G-J, Volkow ND, Franceschi D, Logan J, Pappas N, Shea C, MacGregor RR, Garza V: Smoking a single cigarette does not produce a measurable reduction in brain MAO B in non-smokers. Nicotine Tobacco Res 1999; 1:325–329Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

4. Herning RI, Jones RT, Benowitz N, Mines AH: How a cigarette is smoked determines blood nicotine levels. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1983; 33:84–90Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

5. Jarvis MJ, Tunstall-Pedoe H, Feyerabend C, Vesey C, Saloojee Y: Comparison of tests used to distinguish smokers from non-smokers. Am J Public Health 1987; 77:1435–1438Google Scholar

6. Fowler JS, Volkow ND, Wang GJ, Logan J, Pappas N, Shea C, MacGregor R: Age-related increases in brain monoamine oxidase B in living healthy human subjects. Neurobiol Aging 1997; 18:431–435Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

7. Fowler JS, Wang GJ, Volkow ND, Logan J, Franceschi D, Franceschi M, MacGregor R, Shea C, Garza V, Liu N, Ding YS: Evidence that ginkgo biloba extract does not inhibit MAO A and B in living human brain. Life Sci 2000; 66:PL141–PL146Google Scholar

8. Fowler JS, Volkow ND, Logan J, Schlyer DJ, MacGregor RR, Wang GJ, Wolf AP, Pappas N, Alexoff D, Shea C, Gatley SJ, Dorflinger E, Yoo K, Morawsky L, Fazzinni E: Monoamine oxidase B (MAO B) inhibitor therapy in Parkinson’s disease: the degree and reversibility of human brain MAO B inhibition by Ro 19 6327. Neurology 1993; 43:1984–1992Google Scholar

9. Fowler JS, Volkow ND, Logan J, Pappas N, King P, MacGregor R, Shea C, Garza V, Gatley SJ: An acute dose of nicotine does not inhibit MAO B in baboon brain in vivo. Life Sci 1998; 63:PL19–PL23Google Scholar

10. Khalil AA, Steyn S, Castagnoli N: Isolation and characterization of a monoamine oxidase inhibitor from tobacco leaves. Chem Res Toxicol 2000; 13:31–35Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

11. Simpson GM, Shih JC, Chem K, Flowers C, Kumazawa T, Spring B: Schizophrenia, monoamine oxidase and cigarette smoking. Neuropsychopharmacology 1999; 20:392–394Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar