The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×
Letter to the EditorFull Access

Kandel’s Challenge to Psychoanalysts

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.156.4.664

To the Editor: In his excellent article, “A New Intellectual Framework for Psychiatry,” Eric R. Kandel, M.D., raises disquieting issues for today’s practicing psychiatrist. He calls attention to the need for imparting knowledge about the newest advances in the biological aspects of mental illness. Fortunately, he also recognizes the necessity of the psychosocial skills as well. He did not fall into the trap of advocating for the brain at the expense of the mind.

However, he did not present a solution for the problems he raised. Where is the practicing psychiatrist to get the training and education that is so necessary? We have to think not only of the young medical students or psychiatrists in training. But what of those out in the field? Books, articles, and lectures cannot fulfill the need for advanced training in neuroanatomy, molecular biology, genetics, and psychopharmacology. It seems to me that only medical schools can undertake the task of postgraduate education, and sadly, this does not seem to be perceived either as a primary task or as a secondary one.

I hope that Dr. Kandel’s article can stimulate efforts to deal with the problem.