The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.155.11.1626e

To the Editor: Here we describe a case of apparent cocaine-induced catatonia. To our knowledge, catatonia related to cocaine use has not been previously reported.

Her mother brought Ms. A, a 36-year-old woman with no prior psychiatric history except cocaine abuse, to the emergency ward after 6 days of bizarre and withdrawn behavior following a crack-cocaine binge. In the emergency ward, Ms. A continued to exhibit mutism, staring, active resistance to being touched or moved, and purposeless, stereotyped hand gestures. Haloperidol (1 mg i.m.), administered for presumed cocaine-induced psychosis, had no effect. A psychiatric consultant diagnosed catatonia and administered lorazepam (2 mg i.m.). Two hours later, Ms. A was alert, oriented, cooperative, and responsive to questions and commands. Her vital signs and results of laboratory tests and physical examination were unremarkable except for cocaine in her urine.

We suspect that cocaine-induced catatonia may be underrecognized in emergency ward settings. For example, Ms. A’s medical record revealed two prior admissions for “altered mental status” following cocaine use. During each admission, the patient was withdrawn and mute with a period of bizarre agitation preceding the first episode. In neither case was a diagnosis of catatonia considered.

Recognition of catatonia is clinically important because antipsychotics have been reported to precipitate neuroleptic malignant syndrome in catatonic patients (1). This observation fits with the hypothesis that neuroleptic malignant syndrome is a variant of catatonia (2, 3). Interestingly, cocaine use has shown other connections to the catatonia-neuroleptic malignant syndrome spectrum. A higher incidence of neuroleptic malignant syndrome has been reported among cocaine abusers receiving neuroleptics (5.1%) than among nonusers (4), and the syndrome of hyperthermia, delirium, and rhabdomyolysis following cocaine use overlaps with several key features of neuroleptic malignant syndrome (5). These findings suggest that the increased risk of neuroleptic malignant syndrome among patients with catatonia or cocaine abuse may be related to shared alterations in dopamine systems and provide a possible explanation for the observations in this case report.

The implications of this case are that cocaine-related catatonia may be underrecognized in the emergency ward setting and that antipsychotic treatment of catatonia or cocaine-induced conditions may be associated with an increased risk for developing neuroleptic malignant syndrome. Benzodiazepines and ECT are still the treatments of choice for catatonia of any etiology.

References

1. White DA, Robins AH: Catatonia: harbinger of the neuroleptic malignant syndrome. Br J Psychiatry 1991; 158:419–421Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

2. Fink M: Recognizing NMS as a type of catatonia. Neuropsychiatry Neuropsychol Behav Neurol 1995; 8:75–76Google Scholar

3. White DA: Catatonia and the neuroleptic malignant syndrome—a single entity? Br J Psychiatry 1992; 161:558–560Google Scholar

4. Akpaffiong MJ, Ruiz P: Neuroleptic malignant syndrome: a complication of neuroleptics and cocaine abuse. Psychiatr Q 1991; 62:299–309Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

5. Kosten TR, Kleber HD: Rapid death during cocaine abuse: a variant of the neuroleptic malignant syndrome? Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse 1988; 14:335–346Google Scholar