The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×
No Access

A national study of psychiatric hospital care

Published Online:

BACKGROUND: The delivery system for psychiatric inpatient services in the United States has changed dramatically over the past 30 years, undergoing a marked privatization. METHOD: To assess the effect of changes in ownership and types of inpatient settings on the structure of the mental health services system, the authors surveyed a national sample of nonfederal mental health facilities in 1988. RESULTS: Comparing their data to those of earlier surveys, they found that a decline in the number of patients per staff occurred in most settings over the last decade, suggesting that this aspect of quality of care may have improved. They observed important ownership-related differences in 1988 in diagnostic mix (e.g., more schizophrenia treated in public facilities than in private ones) and in payer source (e.g., more third-party revenues in public facilities than occurred in the past). CONCLUSIONS: There was a significant interaction between ownership form and type of facility, suggesting that the type of inpatient setting, ownership, and the relation between the two should be considered in assessing the impact of privatization on the accessibility of health care available for the mentally ill. The authors found that the increase in private psychiatric hospitals has widened the availability and choice of treatment facilities for those with private funding sources (especially children and adolescents) but has not had a similar effect in increasing sources of care for the seriously mentally ill dependent upon public financing.

Access content

To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.