Independent Examination of Patients Hospitalized Against Their Will
Abstract
The justification for legal commitment of the mentally ill has come under increasing public and professional scrutiny. While there have been few abuses or errors, certain types of problems are more likely to be reflected in unmerited hospitalization. This paper reviews nine hospitalizations in which an independent psychiatric review was requested by a private attorney. In three of the nine cases, mandatory hospitalization was not justified. Problem cases involved individuals with a history of mental illness, domestic or marital disputes, and organic mental illness—particularly those related to aging. Another factor to be kept in mind is that examination at a later date may reflect the marked improvement that has occurred clinically rather than the symptom picture at the time of hospitalization.
Access content
To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.- Personal login
- Institutional Login
- Sign in via OpenAthens
- Register for access
-
Please login/register if you wish to pair your device and check access availability.
Not a subscriber?
PsychiatryOnline subscription options offer access to the DSM-5 library, books, journals, CME, and patient resources. This all-in-one virtual library provides psychiatrists and mental health professionals with key resources for diagnosis, treatment, research, and professional development.
Need more help? PsychiatryOnline Customer Service may be reached by emailing [email protected] or by calling 800-368-5777 (in the U.S.) or 703-907-7322 (outside the U.S.).
