The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×
ArticleNo Access

True and False Experts: A Second Look

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.130.12.1351

In 1878 Dr. Eugene Grissom examined a number of forensic and reform issues concerning psychiatry and attacked a colleague who had been critical of the profession. The ensuing confrontation between the two seems particularly significant today. Both from within and without, psychiatry is being criticized for its exclusiveness, élitism, and traditionalism. As was the case almost 100 years ago, the issue often seems to be less a matter of the substantive nature of the criticism and rebuttals than one of hostility toward psychiatry itself.

Access content

To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.