The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.121.11.xii

In this study of the relationship between personality and autonomic reactivity to stress, a small group, 6 of 46 college students, were outstanding psychologically. They received the highest ratings for Intimacy and Involvement which referred to an overall judgment regarding the degree and quality of healthy intimacy in personal relationships and the extent and nature of involvement and commitment to ideas and activities. They showed the most marked psychophysiological reactivity to laboratory stress, including the fact that while in the threatening situation being free to fantasy led to a rise in their autonomic indicators of anxiety. Other students utilized the fantasy defensively to bind anxiety, and their physiological indicators fell. The small, most reactive group also tended to show superior visual-motor performance.

The data were interpreted to mean that the greater physiological reactivity was a function of the more intense involvement in the novel and realistically nonthreatening laboratory situation. The small group of 6 who remained psychologically more open showed better adaptation to the stress situation as well as more marked physiological reactivity. The lesser physiological reactivity in the other students was thought to represent defensive, emotional withdrawal which resulted in less successful adaptation to the laboratory stress.

Access content

To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.