The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.118.4.341

The social history questionnaire is not a substitute for, nor can it be favorably compared to history-taking in a personal interview. Yet we feel that it is a legitimate diagnostic instrument in certain situations. That is to say, the questionnaire is preferable to sparse information gathered in a hasty manner or to no history at all. The time it saves, the prime material it offers, its built-in supervisory features, and its therapeutic possibilities may counterbalance the impersonality and superficiality of a form. We are presenting our SASH (Self-Administered Social History) in the hope that others will do likewise, and that certain optimum history questionnaires and questions might be developed.

Access content

To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.